AIFM Aromatest Inhibitor for Men Now Available
- Thread starter ulter
- Start date
Vennom96
New member
I don't understand how applying something to your skin can keep the water off? Not saying this doesn't work, just don't understand it. Does it seep into your skin then into your bloodstream then do it's thing then?
Let's say you apply it to the top of your feet, how long after can you put socks on?
Let's say you apply it to the top of your feet, how long after can you put socks on?
I
Insane_Man
Guest
lionhead said:update. burning sensation when used directly on the nipples... very uncomfortable..
Trying to rid yourself of gyno?
demonsweat
New member
Sounds like some real interesting stuff. I'm going to have to try it soon.
The whole point of post cycle therapy (pct) is in restoring natural balance in the hormonal metabolic pathways. So, while I wholeheartedly support use of AI's during the cycle, they must not be used during post cycle therapy (pct). Use of powerful endocrine disrupters--whether AI's or finasteride--during post cycle therapy (pct) simply make no sense whatsoever in helping restore these pathways.
Many of us are seeing significant estrogen rebound once the AI's are D/C'd. And driving E too low (which happens when AI's are employed during post cycle therapy (pct)) not only extends the time of cardiovascular plaque deposition induced by the AAS, it also compromises immune function (already inhibited by the secondary hypogonadism present then) and perhaps sexual function as well. And who needs any of that then?
AI employment during post cycle therapy (pct) was originally thought to be a good idea because aromatase inhibition has clearly been shown to elevate testosterone levels. But those who truly understand the metabolic pathways at work feel differently. Finasteride will similarly elevate gonadotropin production--and we all know how stupid an idea that is for post cycle therapy (pct).
I would also add that a molecule is a molecule--whether they were developed for males or females is of absolutely no consequence from either a logical or a metabolic perspective.
Many of us are seeing significant estrogen rebound once the AI's are D/C'd. And driving E too low (which happens when AI's are employed during post cycle therapy (pct)) not only extends the time of cardiovascular plaque deposition induced by the AAS, it also compromises immune function (already inhibited by the secondary hypogonadism present then) and perhaps sexual function as well. And who needs any of that then?
AI employment during post cycle therapy (pct) was originally thought to be a good idea because aromatase inhibition has clearly been shown to elevate testosterone levels. But those who truly understand the metabolic pathways at work feel differently. Finasteride will similarly elevate gonadotropin production--and we all know how stupid an idea that is for post cycle therapy (pct).
I would also add that a molecule is a molecule--whether they were developed for males or females is of absolutely no consequence from either a logical or a metabolic perspective.
Last edited:
ManOfMuscle
Death Dealer
Thanks for your input Swale... Guess I won't plan on using this stuff for pct.
oestrogen is the primary suppressor of the HPGA. oestrogen suppression during post cycle therapy (pct) enhances recovery of the axis.
oestrogen rebound does not occur with suicidal AI's.
normalization of the axis, as you refer to will occur with the withdrawal of all endocrine distubances including tamoxifen, clomifin, and any aromatase inhibitor.
as to the name, its a name and for various reasons such market limitations are preferred.
however the primary purpose of AIFM is use during cycle.
there are many different opinions with respect to what is most effective when it comes to post cycle therapy. You are entitled to beleive that AI's should not be used and only SERMS should be (likely one serm over another). However there is both clinical and anecdotal evidence that supports use of AI's during post cycle therapy (pct).
oestrogen rebound does not occur with suicidal AI's.
normalization of the axis, as you refer to will occur with the withdrawal of all endocrine distubances including tamoxifen, clomifin, and any aromatase inhibitor.
as to the name, its a name and for various reasons such market limitations are preferred.
however the primary purpose of AIFM is use during cycle.
there are many different opinions with respect to what is most effective when it comes to post cycle therapy. You are entitled to beleive that AI's should not be used and only SERMS should be (likely one serm over another). However there is both clinical and anecdotal evidence that supports use of AI's during post cycle therapy (pct).
Ok so this is an "aromasin topical spray" correct? I actually bought the liquid oral one from a well known company and used it for 3 weeks, it did nothing for me and i had to switch to arimidex, I complained to the company and they told me sometimes it doesnt work for certain individuals...is this true?
Similar threads
