I found this info about IGF:
TL;DR
IGF does not help build bigger muscles in adults. Its only effects are to increase the rate of healing and to reduce glucose in the bloodstream.
Snippets from a much longer and more in depth explaination:
What purpose, then, does IGF1 serve?
Obviously it serves many purposes. I would not presume to definitively answer this question. However, it does appear clear from experimental data that the proliferative role of IGF1 is limited to developmental growth and to regenerative repair. IGF1 is necessary for proper development and repair following injury. Young, developing mammals not only need IGF1 for proper development, but overexpression leads to increased growth. The same does not happen in adults overexpressing IGF1. From a transgenic study published in 2010: ***8220;In conclusion, these data show that adult non-growing skeletal muscles are refractory to hypertrophy in response to the elevated IGF-1. By contrast, growing muscles respond by activating signalling downstream from the IGF-1 receptor (demonstrated by phosphorylation of Akt, p70S6K) to increase protein accretion by the myofibres. Thus, the IGF-1-mediated hypertrophy evident in adult transgenic muscles results from enhanced increase in muscle mass mainly during the postnatal growth phase.***8221; (ref)
Am I wasting my time and money on IGF1?
Yes. Anecdotes are not scientific evidence, no matter how loudly they are proclaimed. The previously accepted theory on the role of IGF1 in muscle hypertrophy has been reversed. Many are apparently slow to get the message. This should not come as a surprise to readers of this forum. I merely wanted to give a concise review of some of the recent, relevant literature. All currently available scientific evidence based on in vivo studies indicates that IGF1 plays no role in normal, exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy.
I believe that a lot of the observed results is simply a matter of dosing. I'll provide two ways of looking at this:
1) If you understand the reference ranges for physiologic IGF-1, and then you look at the expected volume of distribution of IGF-1, you can come up with a reasonable lower limit for whole body IGF-1 for a single replacement dosage. (Remember that IGF-1 has a relatively short half-life).
Labcorp reference range for IGF-1: Peaks at 15yo (127-554), and for a 36-40yo (83-233)
This frames things a little better. Reference ranges are given in ng/mL. How many mL do you have? A lower limit to the volume of distribution for an adult male would be about 5L. it's probably higher than this because charged particles also get carried by binding proteins (IGFBP3 and albumin for example). Remember your blood volume is lower than your whole body water volume, so this should give us a very overly-conservative lower floor for volume of distribution. 5L is 5000. Multiply that by 233 ng/mL and you would get a replacement dosage to get yourself to the upper limit of normal for a 36-40 year old adult male. This would have to be dosed multiple times a day given the short half life. 233 ng * 5000 mL = 1165000 ng whole body IGF-1. This is equal to approximately 1.2 mg.
So to create a notable physiologic effect, you would likely have to dose IGF-1 at multiple daily doses of at least 1.2mg.
2) Here's the second way of looking at it: Look at the reference range for the 15 year old. It's roughly 2-3 times higher than the adult example I provided. Now, let's look at therapeutic IGF-1 which is prescribed for GH deficiency. The pharmaceutical used is Increlex, which is just recombinant human IGF-1. No adult dosing information is provided, because it is not indicated for adults. Pediatric dosing for > 2years old is 0.04 - 0.12 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily. A maximum of 0.24 mg/kg is suggested. (Note that these are milligrams, not micrograms). A 100kg bodybuilder would be taking 4 mg twice a day to be at the lower limit of therapeutic for a child. Looking at the reference ranges given above, this is probably not an overestimate of what an adult would need to change his or her physiology to a level that would be noticeable.
3)
Here is a human study worth checking out where they gave adult diabetics GH and IGF-1 simultaneously. The administered 0.45 IU and 0.9 IU of GH, and coadministered 15 and 30 micrograms per kilogram per day IGF-1. The higher dose is equivalent to 3000 ug or 3mg per day for a 100kg man.
Their conclusion using lean bodymass, bodyfat, and subcutaneous fat as markers?
Combined GH and IGF-I treatment resulted in positive but rather small effects and might be a treatment option in a few selected patients.
My conclusion is that even 3mg per day of IGF-1 will likely not have significant effects. You would likely need to administer 20+ mg of IGF-1 to get a supraphysiologic effect, and would also likely gain the most benefit if it were combined with GH. Do a quick cost benefit analysis on this one and you might reach the same conclusion that I have.
The best we might be able to do affordably with IGF-1 is get some localized effects such as healing.
Datbtrue