Austinite's NEW gyno reversal procedure

DreDay187

Beast666 FanClub Pres
I got an update from Austinite about some issues concerning running Raloxifene at 60mg/day for extended periods of time and the effects it had on bone mineral density. The following is his updated recommendations on gyno reversal, enjoy.


Austinite said:
This is the new ADVISED protocol:

60mg daily for 10 days ONLY. Then 30mg daily until gynecomastia is reversed.

WHY THE CHANGE:

Doses of 60 to 100mg of Raloxifene can result in bone demineralization. effected bone morphogenetic proteins include, but not limited to FGF, PGE2, M-CSF and PDGF.

Recommended Supplementation during Treatment:

Vitamin D and Calcium are recommended during Raloxifene treatment. 5000 IU vitamin D daily, and 500 mg of calcium daily.

This was just brought to my attention by an MD specialized in this field. I apologize for distributing the old protocol, however, this goes to show that you can research something to death and still not learn everything.

raloxifene remains the superior compound for gynecomastia reversal today.
 
Hey Dre.. I'm on evista.. Now here is my delema..
I am taking the pharm grade evista at 60 mg per tab .. And once a pharmacist told me that film coated tablets are not to be cut .. Is this true?
And if yes, what I do to take only 30 Mgs?
60 Mgs eod seems irrational .
Plz advice .
 
I want to know the specifics on how a drug can deteriorate breast tissue, or is "Gyno" (The primary step/puffy nipples) not actually breast tissue?
 
Hey Dre.. I'm on evista.. Now here is my delema..
I am taking the pharm grade evista at 60 mg per tab .. And once a pharmacist told me that film coated tablets are not to be cut .. Is this true?
And if yes, what I do to take only 30 Mgs?
60 Mgs eod seems irrational .
Plz advice .

I have a cousin who's a pharmacist so I'll ask him and see what he says. Off hand I believe its ok to do and found the following supporting it: View attachment 553645

Evista is on a list of medications that cannot be crushed but it looks like splitting the tabs is not an issue.
 
I want to know the specifics on how a drug can deteriorate breast tissue, or is "Gyno" (The primary step/puffy nipples) not actually breast tissue?

Gyno is hyperplasia of the ductal cells in the breast. It is a benign enlargement of breast tissue. Estrogen binding to the ER in breast tissue is a leading cause of gyno. The way SERM's work at getting rid of gyno is by binding to the ER in breast tissue and acting as an antagonist. By binding to the receptor and not activating it, it disallows estrogen from binding.
 
Thnx dre buddy..
I already cut it.. But would like to hear wt ur cousin would say abt the subject.
 
Gyno is hyperplasia of the ductal cells in the breast. It is a benign enlargement of breast tissue. Estrogen binding to the ER in breast tissue is a leading cause of gyno. The way SERM's work at getting rid of gyno is by binding to the ER in breast tissue and acting as an antagonist. By binding to the receptor and not activating it, it disallows estrogen from binding.

So what determines the need for surgery VS Serm therapy?

Serms have to be implemented upon the first stage of collective ductal cells?
 
So what determines the need for surgery VS Serm therapy?

Serms have to be implemented upon the first stage of collective ductal cells?

They're both viable options. SERM's are obviously less invasive, less costly, and just a generally easier approach than going under the knife for some people. Surgery without insurance can be costly but one can pick up a SERM from a source or research chem company for dirt cheap (relative to the cost of surgery). A BB/magazine model friend at the gym told me he was going to get gyno surgery in Brazil for a few thousand dollars, didn't do it bc he didn't want to ruin his vacation. Now he's planning on doing it in the states for $5000+ (not 100% sure on the numbers). A bottle of ralox or tamox from RUI is considerably cheaper.

SERM's have a pretty high success rate even in pubertal gyno so I wouldn't say it depends on the stage of gyno but moreso how reactive your own body is to the treatment. There's many causes such as estrogen dominance, certain medications and recreational drugs can cause it, testosterone:estrogen ratio being off, etc. they all usually boil down to estrogen or progesterone as a root cause from what I've seen. IMO it's cheaper and less invasive to try SERM therapy first and chances are it should work for most (have seen figures as high as 70-80% success rate in some sources). If SERM's don't work, letro is one potion but will necessitate crushing your E2 to be effective and it's not as effective as SERM's to begin with, and surgery is another option.
 
I'd be a little careful with the calcium.. especially if somebody is already taking a multivitamin with a high dosage in it or think that more is better - it really isn't with calcium.
 
I get that, and increasing both phosphate and calcium will help together, but there is a tendency for people to overdo it with supplements is all, people react badly to sudden increases in calcium, if for example they already were supplementing then increased the dose/doubled.
 
At what point would you say to just go with the surgery. Being on serm therapy for say a year?
 
Back
Top