Best way to test if HGH is the real deal

[halfwit]

PrivateMDlabs says to fast. Is that required? Thanks

I know that you need to for natty GH testing, but not sure how it would matter with exogenous HGH. I probably would just to be absolutely sure that nothing interferes with the results since we're talking about easily the most expensive compound in this game.

 

[bbbjames]

I know that you need to for natty GH testing, but not sure how it would matter with exogenous HGH. I probably would just to be absolutely sure that nothing interferes with the results since we're talking about easily the most expensive compound in this game.

Good point

 

[AndreiD]

Ya he said i didnt have a pen wtf? He doesn't even know how to measure ius lol plus i do t know him does he have a agenda? Who knows

Yes i didn't have a pen. I clearly stated i got only the Pfizer cartridge and couldn't get my hands on a Pfizer pen. That's what i was talking about. http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=583

If you know how the Pfizer cartridge looks like then you must know that it has part BAC water and part GH powder. That part BAC water get's pushed by the pen (if you have one) into the powder for mixing. Problem is the pen does it for you and then you only set the dosage on the pen and that's it. If you don't have a pen you also don't know how much water there is in that cartridge, so the only way to do it is to manually mix it with the powder and then pull all the mixed GH out in a syringe and see how many mls of mixed GH you have. Still following? Ok, knowing then that the kit is 36 IU you then know how many UI per ml you have and can do a rule of three (that's math) and estimate how many mls you have to draw for either 5IUs or 10IUs, depending on your choice. I skipped all that, because i didn't want to draw all the GH out and then have to re-inject it back, so i drew some marks on the bottle and that's it. It was a rough estimation, and if you people found it too unscientific for your taste or the results got too confusing for some, it's no problem! Make your own tests, draw your own blood and post it here afterwards for further free critique.

 

[247bulk]

Does anyone know what 115 iu of serostim is worth/should cost? Cheers

 

[49ER]

Yes i didn't have a pen. I clearly stated i got only the Pfizer cartridge and couldn't get my hands on a Pfizer pen. That's what i was talking about. http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=583

If you know how the Pfizer cartridge looks like then you must know that it has part BAC water and part GH powder. That part BAC water get's pushed by the pen (if you have one) into the powder for mixing. Problem is the pen does it for you and then you only set the dosage on the pen and that's it. If you don't have a pen you also don't know how much water there is in that cartridge, so the only way to do it is to manually mix it with the powder and then pull all the mixed GH out in a syringe and see how many mls of mixed GH you have. Still following? Ok, knowing then that the kit is 36 IU you then know how many UI per ml you have and can do a rule of three (that's math) and estimate how many mls you have to draw for either 5IUs or 10IUs, depending on your choice. I skipped all that, because i didn't want to draw all the GH out and then have to re-inject it back, so i drew some marks on the bottle and that's it. It was a rough estimation, and if you people found it too unscientific for your taste or the results got too confusing for some, it's no problem! Make your own tests, draw your own blood and post it here afterwards for further free critique.

Misunderstood you then but basically based on blood work ate you saying generics are better?

 

[AndreiD]

Misunderstood you then but basically based on blood work ate you saying generics are better?

Not by a long shot as you could see that the pharma grade GH was roughly 2x more potent. Still don't completely understand the relationship between GH levels and IGF-1 levels, and why sometimes they spike and sometime they don't.

PS: On Riptropins i have similar results. Strong on GH side but normal on IGF1.

PSS: My only reason why i posted that initially was because i wanted others to know that the stuff is good to go. People already hinted i was talking about PSL.