If someone were to choose to cut naturally opposed to using AAS's (Predominantly Winny/Stana, Prop, Var) and the deficit of the diet was the same, why would AAS help in BURNING more fat? i Understand that it does im just curious to see why and how AAS has a more fat burning effect if the calorie deficit is the same vs's natty cutting. Sure you will be burning more calories whilst on AAS but enough to make such a big difference that i am seeing on some logs?
Difference cutting with AAS and Naturally?
- Thread starter lgnorant
- Start date
I personally believe losing massive amounts of muscle on a natural cut is so over-rated, yes muscle loss does occur although unless you are delving into <6% NATURALLY such muscle loss that people say is inevitable is just dumb...
This is what i was looking for, which is why tren is so good at recomping, right?
71Avido
Waiting to die.
Strawman argument
iwillsucceed
New member
my guess is it helps with strength loss and muscle loss
What more is needed besides nutrient partitioning? Nutrient partitioning is increased with exogenous AAS use and you get a higher p-ratio. The higher the p-ratio the more calories that get used in muscle building and repair instead of fat. So if cutting with gear at the same ratio of deficit as natural it can help shuttle more of the nutrients and calories to preserving and maintaining muscle. Nutrition also plays an important role in recovery so on a deficit your recovery is hindered. AAS increases recovery and ability to sustain higher workloads which would translate to more effective cutting with a sound training program.
if you know the answer why bother to ask.... big kit gave a solid answer on what aas plus cutting does
DexterMorgan
No longer Cycles
Plus you can get bigger while cutting, naturally its not going to happen.
TheFitnessLife4ever
Who dares wins!
The only diff is you'll retain more muscle when dieting. Idc what anyone says, no AAS burns fat significantly.
