EQ or Deca cycle?

Ferrari360

New member
I've been reading the drug profiles section, and it could very well be my
(mis)interpretation, but I got the impression that EQ and Deca will produce somewhat similar results, for example, during a 10-12 wk cycle @ 400-500mg/wk. Apparently Deca is slightly favored as a mass-gainer, but also at the risk of more sides, aromatization due to progestin effects, greater HPTA shutdown, etc. I was wondering if anyone could weigh the pros/cons of each based upon cycles they've done. Thanks.
 
I hate Deca!!

Although deca can produce more gains, maybe 10-15% more, the horrible affects on the HPTA are to great for me to take it!

EQ will not cause as much water gain, but its the only steroid that makes me hungry and result in me eating more.

They are both prices similar, and because of being able to recover so much faster after EQ, I go with EQ everyt time!
 
LAWNSAVER said:
I hate Deca!!

They are both prices similar, and because of being able to recover so much faster after EQ, I go with EQ everyt time!


In fact, Deca is always more expensive, which is another reason to go with EQ!!!
 
number 1 EQ fan here!!!!

for years it was the only drug in my cycle.....nice slow steady gains.
no bad sides.....for the most part!!!

go w/ EQ

god bless
 
I have not tryed EQ but I want to in my next cycle. Deca I have tryed and at 400 mg per it still fucked my libdo even thought I was also on sust 500 mg per week. Never again will I take deca, for me it just isnt worth it
 
Back
Top