HELP Cops = Trouble!!
- Thread starter yoyojfiz
- Start date
Cam01
New member
DaJuiceMan
Mayhem
(could it be possible that uncle z fucked me over and gave me abunch of fake bullshit?
wow that would save my ass pretty good!)
has anyone bough gear from z only to find out it was completly fake?
All my boys thought z's shit was fake
wow that would save my ass pretty good!)
has anyone bough gear from z only to find out it was completly fake?
All my boys thought z's shit was fake
Cam01
New member
Guess that wasn't in store for you.. Sorry for your loss
Losway
New member
THE-DET-OAK
IncreasedMyT @ ULV
the way this thread is going its making me think its bullshit
MightyMouse9999
New member
DEA for a little bit of powder and a couple of vials. Starting to sound like some bs to me too.
Die$eL~Man
Straight Up Gangster !
cosigns...
Teutonic
New member
Ach mensch..ich hab kedacht wir warren in America oder Canada und jets es seit aus dass wir sind in mexico..was ??
please press
1 for english
2 for spanish
3 for german
4 for ebonics (punk ass bitches).
jesus mary and joeseph...
Cam01
New member
LOL Colombian spanish
Cheappinz
Official Sponsor
each vial has 10 doses, but that's not even relevant. they found 100g of powder and I just read somewhere that powder carries a heavier punishment than in liquid form...its bad enough being liquid because we all think 1 vial would count once against you...not the case. one vial has 10cc in it, so you can see how they can sensationalize a small stash.
If I was a cop, I'd paint you as a dealer, obviously going to make about 50 vials, which count for 10 each, so that's 500 points against you if you think like this. They have receipts which will prove it was mailed to you, crossing state lines, federal. mail fraud previously gave the feds the right to take all your assets, but since you have none, I doubt they will do anything with that. but conspiracy holds a 5 year penalty..they have most of the world convicted of conspiracy because they need no proof...its a crappy system.
My biggest beef with this entire scenario is the breach of trust with your mother. When you have a record for the rest of your life, because she decided to snoop on you, you can thank her. I don't think I'd ever forgive such a betrayal. I wish there was a punishment for her crime. I'd like to know how she thought she was going to help you by doing this..Its terrible.
If I was a cop, I'd paint you as a dealer, obviously going to make about 50 vials, which count for 10 each, so that's 500 points against you if you think like this. They have receipts which will prove it was mailed to you, crossing state lines, federal. mail fraud previously gave the feds the right to take all your assets, but since you have none, I doubt they will do anything with that. but conspiracy holds a 5 year penalty..they have most of the world convicted of conspiracy because they need no proof...its a crappy system.
My biggest beef with this entire scenario is the breach of trust with your mother. When you have a record for the rest of your life, because she decided to snoop on you, you can thank her. I don't think I'd ever forgive such a betrayal. I wish there was a punishment for her crime. I'd like to know how she thought she was going to help you by doing this..Its terrible.
b_saan
New member
Just an FYI (if this post is on the level... and who knows but I digress):
As a guest in a home (whether or not it was your mother's makes absolutely no difference) you had a reasonable expectation of privacy from a search of your belongings. Even more so due to the fact that whatever was found was in a locked case. It doesn't matter that your mom found it, a stranger found it or the cops came and searched it themselves, a good lawyer will get all evidence pursuant to a violation of your 4th Amendment rights thrown out. You'll have to pay for it but you will be completely exonerated, this assumes you didn't make any self-incriminating statements to the cops when they showed up.
Here's some case info on the 4th Amendment:
In Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 98-100 (1990), the United States Supreme Court made clear that a guest who stays even one night in a friend's home -- with or without a key, and with or without paying rent - "has a legitimate expectation of privacy in his host's home. That the guest has a host who has ultimate control of the house is not inconsistent with the guest having a legitimate expectation of privacy" in the home. In short, regardless of whether an adult or juvenile resided in a palatial mansion or a single room in a transitional shelter, regardless of whether he owned the residence or was allowed to remain without paying rent, and regardless of whether his landlord, friend or relative had a master key and could enter to ensure that he was abiding by the rules of the house, the guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his home.
As a guest in a home (whether or not it was your mother's makes absolutely no difference) you had a reasonable expectation of privacy from a search of your belongings. Even more so due to the fact that whatever was found was in a locked case. It doesn't matter that your mom found it, a stranger found it or the cops came and searched it themselves, a good lawyer will get all evidence pursuant to a violation of your 4th Amendment rights thrown out. You'll have to pay for it but you will be completely exonerated, this assumes you didn't make any self-incriminating statements to the cops when they showed up.
Here's some case info on the 4th Amendment:
In Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 98-100 (1990), the United States Supreme Court made clear that a guest who stays even one night in a friend's home -- with or without a key, and with or without paying rent - "has a legitimate expectation of privacy in his host's home. That the guest has a host who has ultimate control of the house is not inconsistent with the guest having a legitimate expectation of privacy" in the home. In short, regardless of whether an adult or juvenile resided in a palatial mansion or a single room in a transitional shelter, regardless of whether he owned the residence or was allowed to remain without paying rent, and regardless of whether his landlord, friend or relative had a master key and could enter to ensure that he was abiding by the rules of the house, the guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his home.
