Not to derail the thread
whilst answering the question. There was a little bit of hate going on but it was the fact that the thread turned very dull and didn't spark a good discussion/decent input, I think a lot of it came down to the responses were due to not reading the original post entirely (as stated), not recognising it wasn't a question (as stated), ignorance on that fact that I didn't find this site, sign up, get smashed and tell everyone to run deca, rather if you see I've been here for a while and have done this for a while young as I am. I've contributed heavily in the past and only just popped back up. I feel liek I was just saying or sharing my appreciation for an unorthodox low dose approach, didn't essentially have my post read but and got shit responses and took it personally (I won't go into it, but I swear there are missing posts or edited posts now and I won't accuse without proof and real don't give a shit, I stated the truth, apologised for my wrong-doing responses that were a bit out of character for me and couldn't care less for the thread, then again if you said that to my face, if you had the balls, I'd laugh and say whatever bro good luck to ya and continue on doing what the fuck I do and what works
And as for Tren bro, been there done that, personally didn't like it on it's own, even at 100mg Tren E it does, in my case need a TRT dose atleast of Test or some hCG to rpovide a Test base, unlike Nandrolone it doesn't aromatase into e2 so you would if you were to compare the two compounds ran alone your more than likely going to get away with Nandro only. Do a google search, you'll find some can do and enjoy Tren only, some Deca only, majority need Test with it either at TRT or beyond, which is individualistic. I would expect a response, if it was a question, something informative and as to why exactly. I would also expect the post to be read in full if providing an answer or not at all otherwise you clearly will cause issues. Again it was stated that the post wasn't even read beyond I ran deca for 6 weeks which was really saying if read properly... I haven't ran Deca alone SINCE 2015, and the least time I actually ran Deca since then was for 6 weeks TRT dose of test, big difference, big, big difference there.
I would expect a response depending on the stats of the user which clearly were not observed, again, due to the responses given only some read the damn post in full, and if it was someone who didn't respond to test very well even with AI's and wanted to try out Deca only I would first tell them to try, even for a second cycle if they didn't like test, to run it at a low dosage this time, with Deca in their. If they felt like it and responded well, after informing them why Test is rec. needed and if you do without it don't expect to run it for a long, long time alone possibly not at all, then I would say maybe try out Deca only, but I wouldn't. I would say try out EQ thirdly.
See my point is, I got the response that was heavily contrasted to the original post which was a discussion not a question... I'd say give Deca only a shot, anything apart from Test only a shot only if you got a few cycles under you already and want to try it out, but be educated and prepared as it is unorthodox to run it without some Test.
Nothing against you either bro just responding in detail after all this thread is here for sparking a good discussion, i know Roush would be interested in that as that's what the thread reeks of to me a nice solid informative and educating while being all civil, discussion, as I like to do so, that's why he is still here and posting up quality helpful posts! Detail and quality of detail is what I aim for when answering any thread where I can and if I have the time. Knowledge is great to share, learning is fun and forever