Age has nothing to do with it, and "muscle maturity" is a phrase created by the bodybuilding culture that means...?
If you're talking about hormone replacement therapy like test/GH to restore normal levels in an old man, then yes. If you're unhappy with the results from a shitload of steroids, then add GH. Just read the FAQs on GH and understand it takes a lot more then 100iu and a month.
he's not talking about old men, he's talking about guys at his gym IN THEIR TWENTIES. And how can you say it has nothing to do with age when you just stated it does when you spoke about restoring an old mans normal levels. Old = age right?
And if you're unhappy with the results of a shitload of steroids, then you're relying on drugs and not eating, training correctly. Saying someone should try GH is OK because they don't like how steroids work is fucking stupid.
How about not giving shitty advice and pointing someone to something like GH for no good reason. Or anything else for that matter until you know what you're taling about.
I dont think GH is a waste for people under 25 but the amount you would have to run at that age is just not worth risking the sides you can get from higher doses.
GH is suppressive for up to 18 hours. So if someone is running it daily it will pretty much bring your natural GH to 0. Since most 25 year olds GH is already in optimum range you would have to take a hefty dose to notice the effects. That is why I dont think it is worth it until your thirties.
On a side note though there is nothing on the planet that has the regenrative properties it does. or should i say cell multiplication.
he's not talking about old men, he's talking about guys at his gym IN THEIR TWENTIES. And how can you say it has nothing to do with age when you just stated it does when you spoke about restoring an old mans normal levels. Old = age right? Let's try this again. He implied GH was a waste because his natural production was still good. His natural test production is still good, does that make steroids a waste? Of course not, we use both at much higher levels.
And if you're unhappy with the results of a shitload of steroids, then you're relying on drugs and not eating, training correctly. EVERYONE who uses GH isn't happy with the results of a shitload of steroids. Why else would you take it? Lol.
Saying someone should try GH is OK because they don't like how steroids work is fucking stupid. I said add GH to your cycle of steroids to improve results. Isn't that why we use all the other drugs with steroids?
How about not giving shitty advice and pointing someone to something like GH for no good reason. Or anything else for that matter until you know what you're taling about. The question was regarding age and GH. My point was that age isn't a factor. Maybe I'm wrong and have a shitty mind-muscle connection along with poor muscle maturity.
I am 27 and just had surgery on my shoulder. ( torn labrum) would hgh help recovery or would you still say it's not advisable for me? Trying to help my recovery go a little quicker.