heavyiron
Community Veteran
Complete agreement on bloodwork. A few questions in regards to the study if I may:
1) do you have full access or just the abstract? I ask bc it says a 140mg implantation which sounds like a 1-time dose to me. Does extended dosing patterns affect the results (prolactin specifically) differently? Also I believe most of us would take a higher dose than 140mg/wk so is it dose dependent on when prolactin starts to rise (like a minimum effective dose but to raise prolactin)? Also I'd love to see the methodology and design of the study
2) in regards to AAS, there's not much difference between an IM injection and a Sub-Q injection right? The study was done with sub-q.
3) how is the endocrine system of a sheep similar and different than in humans? Could this have something to do with prolactin failing to change?
I have not read the full study so no idea on the methodology. These were likely pellet implants as that was/is common with farm animals.
SubC likely has a bit slower onset of action but in the end its pretty similar to IM as far as effect.
Your 3rd question is the bottom line. That's why we both want these guys to get labs and see for themselves. I have asked guys to do this in the past and they had completely normal Prolactin and Progesterone levels. I also have seen labs on guys off steroids with high Prolactin. So labs before you medicate with ancillaries is my mantra. =)