First and foremost, your attempt to erode my post failed miserably, because I never pitched ANYTHING other then answer a question that my associate asked..So please,keep farting peas at the moon..
And if your going to cut, copy and paste anything, please include everything, especially the part where Nootropic compounds are known to be used for "parkinsons, Huntingtons, AND ADHD (it's cited all over the net in numerous pages, do your research)..
I never said that Noopept (nootropic compounds) are used solely for ADHD, however they (and noopept) have been known to be ran concurrently with other compounds to assist problems "ASSOCIATED" with ADHD...Do you know what that means? In lieu of putting a spin on my words, read them twice for better clarity before you even begin to sound like a pompous ass..
Before you make any statements in regards to NOOPEPT not being faked, please provide facts to back this up, because there's been a slew of fake raws being sold for sometime now, and these outsources make outlandish claims and excuses that people are "NON-RESPONDERS".. So, it comes down to knowing and trusting your source.. But, you support this by advocating ANY PEPTIDE company can synthesize these raws so chances of being fake is slim to null, but I guess the market has NEVER ONCE seen fake peptides either huh? You freaking wing nut...
Let me get this right.. Joe Shmoe's peptides, VS a large phrama group (JSC LEKKO).. Ding Ding, we have a winner!
Nootropics have been proven to work, from fish oil (or in your words snake oil), or MUSIC is considered a nootropic supplement..
And yes, you are calling out PSL, with a condescending tone and it's uncalled for man...
Vision, I was respectful yet curt. I have been very quiet even when you're arguing with close friends of mine as I don't like ganging up on folks, especially as facts will sort things out.
My attempt to erode your post? Please take a moment to read your post again, then pull up the Wikipedia page on noopept. If I wanted to attack your post, instead of the methodology employed, I could have started there.
I am trying very hard to be tactful and polite; especially after reading the kind words Jimi posted , but the tone that I have seen in your posts being directed towards me - when you and I have never tangled is beyond amusing. You are using insults when I have not made any, nor have I insinuated any such upon your character. If you'd like, I can go there with you, but I suspect I'll receive a grumpy pm from an administrator as you cry because I hurt your feelings.
Hint: My post was intended EXACTLY as Jimi stated, perhaps it was too gruff for some as I try very hard to be overly nice, but yes - I was trying to give perspective from one of the guys here that has seen some downright retarded shit happen and still remained quiet.
Do not make the assumption that I don't have that ability. I know far more than I let on, but out of RESPECT I choose not to go there.
Understand me. You made (and often do make) claims based on copy/pasted material that is often irrelevant. My quote? From the freaking PATENT PAGE that has to give full disclosure for the product. Ya know, the link that I so nicely provided?
Not once in their literature is attention deficit hyperactivity disorder mentioned. This is the literature from the company you back so fervently. So in fact you're IMPLYING that this product may do what you claim without any proof?
I could imply that my car might fly, but that doesn't necessarily make it true.
I currently inject a melanocortin peptide hormone called 'a-melanocyte-stimulating hormone' (a-MSH) every couple days. This is a peptide that has a very specific purpose and is actually a hormone that surprisingly hasn't made a fortune in its time. Sound familiar? It was invented by a University and has been implicated in ground breaking work to prevent many kinds of cancer.
It's melanotan II. Did I buy it from the University that held the patent? Nope. Did I buy it from the Australian company that was to remarket it and bring it to the US? Nope.
I bought it from a forum sponsor that happens to carry it. That means my skin pigment getting consistently darker is placebo? No, it means that chemistry is somewhat trivial in this regard, and copying a known formula is child's play for chemists. Noopept is absolutely no different, except you have to convince folks that it's WORTH copying.
Fake/bunk peptides are all over the place, but it's often stuff that's 3-5x the cost of the topic of this thread. No profit, no effort. A dyed in the wool capitalist such as yourself should understand this. That's not an insult by the way, it's an observation.
I could argue this all day, but the boss is looking at me funny whilst I'm pounding away on my keyboard on my phone, that I'm not supposed to have in the high voltage area, so I'm going to state that if you simply chill on making huge claims (your first post was a clear advert man) that are NOT proven or even listed by the manufacturer, I will go back to quietly reading threads and popping in to help others in my spare time.
If I insulted PSL, believe me - it would have a much different tone and message. I have stayed very purposely out of sponsor stuff besides RUI since pinnacle for a very good reason. Beware getting a big head; you get free/discount gear for typing on the internet, which is great - but it does not give your words any additional weight.
Again, spoken (typed) in respect for those around me. Not easy as emotions can make us say or do dumb things, but I like to think I have a handle on that today.
