Ronnie coleman' steroid cycle.
- Thread starter SamBBK
- Start date
Just watch his beginning vids - the guy looks like an NFL quarterback, but with 7% BF. He can't claim the "natty title", but the guy is drug free at the moment if that's what you're wondering.
skinnypete
Hammer Time
you obviously never smoked crack.......every weight you had would be sold
skinnypete
Hammer Time
elliot is a beast. he is natty well he did one cycle of tren and test
TriniJuice
I am banned!
lmfao
detroitdrugzzz93
New member
Elliot hulse is not natty, he has a video admitting he has cycled in the past, i don't think his physique is that great for someone whose not natty but he's got some cool vidz.
Last edited:
It sounds like you need to go watch the video again. He clearly said that he used them once in 2009. He's been natty for the past four years.
theblitzkrieg
Blitzkrieg
skinnypete
Hammer Time
i can tell you this with Elliot's strength mental and overall athletic ability and endurance... dude would beat the shit out of me to say the least, like thats hard to do...dudes a monster
MickeyKnox
Junior Bodybuilder
Who is the dude (monster) in the back row left hand side on the isle? That guy is huge!
this !
I don't understand. Are you saying a free base of a stimulant won't cause you to be all over the place, or did you read my statement literally?
Total BS. Ronnie used 36IU HGH per day and diminishing returns usually don't happen until 40IU's per day. And pro bb'ers use well over 100IU's of insulin daily these days, some up to 200IU's. Long-acting slin in the morning, 15-25IU's before each meal, 20-30IU's pre-workout and post-workout. Most of the good ones never eat without slin, as they feel it's pointless to do otherwise.
Don't forget the vast quantities of research peptides. Little research has been done on them, but pro bb'ers are drug addicts and are scared that others might be doing these things and gaining benefit from them. Gear use is 5g-10g per week typically. Orals in the 100-500mg range daily. Some get off orals occasionally, some don't. You should for liver health, but bb'ing has never been about health and never will be.
Also, rec drugs like narcotics, weed, and amphetamines are common to tolerate the abuse on the body. A lot of the bullshit cycles you see like this one might get you up to a relatively lean 220-230 assuming average height and good genetics, but you need to really pound down the doses if you ever expect to competing at 250+.
In the end, it's all genetics anyway. Many guys get tons of sides on 1g gear per week with nothing else added. Those guys simply aren't met for pro bb'ing. Most pros use 6g+ per week. 6g shouldn't be necessary but considering that most of these guys never come off, their receptors are always saturated and only get further growth by continually pounding down higher doses over the course of 10-20 years.
Don't forget the vast quantities of research peptides. Little research has been done on them, but pro bb'ers are drug addicts and are scared that others might be doing these things and gaining benefit from them. Gear use is 5g-10g per week typically. Orals in the 100-500mg range daily. Some get off orals occasionally, some don't. You should for liver health, but bb'ing has never been about health and never will be.
Also, rec drugs like narcotics, weed, and amphetamines are common to tolerate the abuse on the body. A lot of the bullshit cycles you see like this one might get you up to a relatively lean 220-230 assuming average height and good genetics, but you need to really pound down the doses if you ever expect to competing at 250+.
In the end, it's all genetics anyway. Many guys get tons of sides on 1g gear per week with nothing else added. Those guys simply aren't met for pro bb'ing. Most pros use 6g+ per week. 6g shouldn't be necessary but considering that most of these guys never come off, their receptors are always saturated and only get further growth by continually pounding down higher doses over the course of 10-20 years.
DrHouse
New member
Would you mind to PM this study? I would be very interested into looking at such a study. If not, no worries. I will google it
DrHouse
New member
I just watched Marc Loblinder yesterday on YouTube and he made a claim that pros don't take as much as most people think. He claimed low level NPC competitors were taking more than IFBB pros (top contenders) and not all use insulin. Claimed first that genetics are the major contributor which I could agree with. As a successful businessman and trainer, I would consider him a more reputable source of information than the average user here. No offense to those who are also successful who would like to remain anonymous.
But with Marc, he claims that unless you plan on staying on for life, anabolics are not for you. He claims that gains made from anabolics are not possible to maintain and you will eventually come back to your "natural" state.
Is there a reputable person who could comment on the claims?
But with Marc, he claims that unless you plan on staying on for life, anabolics are not for you. He claims that gains made from anabolics are not possible to maintain and you will eventually come back to your "natural" state.
Is there a reputable person who could comment on the claims?
DrHouse
New member
So, you claim that if I were to use anabolics to exceed 250 pounds it would be impossible to maintain that? Also, when I'm saying 250 pounds i'm thinking of relatively lean 250. Not 250 and 20% body fat.
How do you measure genetic limits? Who knows for sure? No one.
Similar threads
