schering test enanth

Brock Landers

New member
Because I'm obsessive compulsive I have begun planning/purcashing items for my summer cycle:D. I used Testex elmu cyp for my first two cycles, and want to stay with human grade gear for the next one. I have heard plenty of feedback about ICN's but never alot of mention of Schering brand Test enanth. So come on, give me any experiences with this brand
 
Schering Testovirons rock........just make sure you use a trustworthy well proven source as there are, or have been some good fakes floating around.
 
I dont think so bro. ICN's Tested out at 180mg per amp. Very unstable and I wouldnt trust them right now.
Scherings Testoviron is the best and most accurately dosed human Enanthane out there.
I got great gains on them.
 
They are questionable bro.
I did a cycle with the lot number 3507 1002 1007 at 3 amps per week and they felt really weak. Didnt get the gains I expected.
I ran out of ICN's and switched to Schering at 750mg per week and noticed a big difference.
Libido was high and gains started to increase.
 
StoneColdNTO said:
yeah......lot # 1582042, are you saying there are more problems that no one seems to know about ??
as far as i know the problem was solved a while back and isnt an ongoing thing . and for the record ive never opened an amp of icn test that wasnt over filled , some by as much as probably .3 or .4 of an cc , unless someone has proof that they are having trouble know i would definately use them again :)
 
The beeing ovefilled has nothing to do with it bro. Whats the bid deal?
You're injecting more oil and less active ingridient.
Who cares if it comes out to 1.2ml's per amp if theres only 180mg's of Enanthane in each?
 
Canuck4 said:
They are questionable bro.
I did a cycle with the lot number 3507 1002 1007 at 3 amps per week and they felt really weak. Didnt get the gains I expected.
I ran out of ICN's and switched to Schering at 750mg per week and noticed a big difference.
Libido was high and gains started to increase.

OK....well those were produced in October 2002, I have heard that all production after March 2003 is without a doubt OK.
 
I hope so.
They are pretty inexpensive so if they fixxed them Id like to give them another try. Also I would like to see some recent lab results on the newer batches.
 
Canuck4 said:
The beeing ovefilled has nothing to do with it bro. Whats the bid deal?
You're injecting more oil and less active ingridient.
Who cares if it comes out to 1.2ml's per amp if theres only 180mg's of Enanthane in each?
i thought they tested 180 mg per cc not amp but you could be right :confused: , like i said i am under the understanding that the problem is solved . i used the old icns and they kicked ass but i also used a batch of the underdosed ones and there was a big difference between them .three of the old icn amps per week were stronger than 5 cc of qv cyp to me . i would like to see a lab report on the newest batches .
 
Canuck4 said:
I hope so.
They are pretty inexpensive so if they fixxed them Id like to give them another try. Also I would like to see some recent lab results on the newer batches.

Yeah me too......I have lot 1700 0603 0608 that I'm gonna start in about 3 weeks.
 
StoneColdNTO said:
Yeah me too......I have lot 1700 0603 0608 that I'm gonna start in about 3 weeks.
we have a test subject :D , keep us posted on the results bro because if they are back to the original quality they are the best in the game [quality/price] in my opinion . but if they havent got their shit together by now they arent going to .
 
Schering test is the real deal! That is my favorite, human grade test is the only way to go!

I have used Schering, T200 (brovel and tornell), T400, and QV. The Schering seemed to hurt the least and really seemed to be dosed right compared to the others.
 
Back
Top