Why are you accusing me of not doing research, before experimenting?
Isn't that EXACTLY what I'm doing?
Whoever told you I had a big stash of winny, EQ, and deca, and was in the process of injecting it, was lying. Not sure who told you this but you couldn't possibly assume this all on your own. I certainly made No indication that I was 'experimenting', and I am clearly researching it.
You should try to lift some weights naturally before you start to experiment with big stacks of drugs.
I think I made it perfectly clear that I understand "hardening". Cmon. Why would you say otherwise? ;\
You could already have a seriously low bf%, and therefore any growth at all, would harden you.
If you were obese and started to cut, that might also be considered "hardening".
So any anabolics at all would 'harden you' in this sense. In fact, any exercise would.
So, to make the statement that eq especially 'hardens' you, makes it sound like it has some kind of special effect that test doesn't have, such as helping one grow 'more dense muscle'. I was obviously just trying to have this clarified. No need to resort to the "noob" attack just because you can't explain.
Maybe you think because EQ doesn't cause water retention, that it hardens you. But cycles are just temporary and we should be more focused on their permanent, lasting effects.
You may not be as "hard" while on a test cycle, as with EQ, but after it's done and the water has left, you will be.
Perhaps one anabolic might help you cut more fat than another, so it could be described as having a 'hardening' effect. But hardening is a really loose term. We should be more specific. There's really just the three ways one anabolic might "harden" someone. Helping them cut fat, helping them grow, and possibly helping them stay dry.