I keep hearing mixed reviews about sustanon. At this point it doesn't matter since I paid a lot for what I have (bought it last year but chose to spend a year doing research before touching it). Now the time has come...I will be using sustanon for sure or else it would be a big waste of money and good gear!
Anyway, people say that you need MORE sustanon than you would test E for a cycle. For example, 500mg a week would be fine for test E, but not for sustanon.
Now, I'm not totally clear on this, but I assume that this is true ONLY if frequency of injection is equal for both compounds. With sustanon, we have the two fast acting esters (prop and phenylprop), then the medium and slow esters - to inject less frequently than ED or EOD would not maximize the benefit from the two slowest acting esters and so you would need more (> 500mg weekly of sustanon) to elicit a comparable effect to enanthate IF injection frequency is the same for both compounds (test E and sustanon shot 2X weekly for example). My guess is that the additional sustanon is needed to get additional benefits from the caproate and decanoate, with the two slow acting esters essentially going to waste (on such a schedule as described above).
Put another way: Using 750mg of sustanon shot twice a week will give you maximum gains from the isocaproate (24% of total), and decanoate (40% of total), with the propionate and phenylpropionate basically going to waste...
64% of 750mg = 480mg of useful test = comparable to injecting a weekly total of 500mg of test E.
But if you adjust your injection frequency accordingly...What would make test E so much better than sustanon
Am I way off base here, or is it fair to say that the main problems with sustanon come from people creating less than ideal injection frequency schedules?
I know this was a bit long, but a lot of you guys are chemical geniuses and just figured I would throw this at you.
Thanks!
PS - if any of the Canadian bros know if PVL sustanon 350 was underdosed, let me know.
Anyway, people say that you need MORE sustanon than you would test E for a cycle. For example, 500mg a week would be fine for test E, but not for sustanon.
Now, I'm not totally clear on this, but I assume that this is true ONLY if frequency of injection is equal for both compounds. With sustanon, we have the two fast acting esters (prop and phenylprop), then the medium and slow esters - to inject less frequently than ED or EOD would not maximize the benefit from the two slowest acting esters and so you would need more (> 500mg weekly of sustanon) to elicit a comparable effect to enanthate IF injection frequency is the same for both compounds (test E and sustanon shot 2X weekly for example). My guess is that the additional sustanon is needed to get additional benefits from the caproate and decanoate, with the two slow acting esters essentially going to waste (on such a schedule as described above).
Put another way: Using 750mg of sustanon shot twice a week will give you maximum gains from the isocaproate (24% of total), and decanoate (40% of total), with the propionate and phenylpropionate basically going to waste...
64% of 750mg = 480mg of useful test = comparable to injecting a weekly total of 500mg of test E.
But if you adjust your injection frequency accordingly...What would make test E so much better than sustanon
Am I way off base here, or is it fair to say that the main problems with sustanon come from people creating less than ideal injection frequency schedules?
I know this was a bit long, but a lot of you guys are chemical geniuses and just figured I would throw this at you.
Thanks!
PS - if any of the Canadian bros know if PVL sustanon 350 was underdosed, let me know.
Last edited:
