Which would be harder on the hairline??

[aussie mark]

Hey guys
Researching for my next cycle and wondering which cycle out of these would be harder on the hairline.I am susceptable to MPB. This would be my 3rd cycle.
Im 25yrs old 230lbs 5,9 and been training for 6 yrs.

1st cycle was 500mg test e/week for 12wks.
2nd cycle was 500mg test e and 400mg eq for 12wks.

Those were fairly mild on my hair and with the help of finasteride and nizoral i lost minimal hair.

Proposed next cycles-
1)
500mg test e/week
100mg tren ace/eod

OR
2)
500mg test e/week
400mg eq/week
50mg anavar ED

I know tren is harsh on the hair for some people but so is doing over 1gram a week of aas like i would be in my 2nd proposed cycle.
What do u guys think would be the easiest on the hairline?
Cheers for your help

 

[epoxy]

Tren will be the harshest, hands down. But if you are predisposed to MPB it'll happen either way. Probably can't beat the gains with Tren though, especially comparing it to a low dose of 400mg of EQ, not nearly enough. Also if you're running the Tren Ace i'd run Test Prop with it, 6 weeks and it's done.

 

[aussie mark]

Yeh good call on the prop man.thatd def be better to use with tren ace if i decide to go that way.

 

[dialtone]

Tren will be the harshest, hands down.

tren shouldnt effect your hairline at all, considering it doesnt convert to dht. if i were you, i would just stay away from dht derivative drugs (ie winstrol, primo, materon, even Anavar (var) and tbol).

 

[aussie mark]

tren shouldnt effect your hairline at all, considering it doesnt convert to dht. if i were you, i would just stay away from dht derivative drugs (ie winstrol, primo, materon, even Anavar (var) and tbol).

Yeh your right tren doesnt convert to dht but tren itself is very androgenic.even more than dht id assume.

 

[aussie mark]

bump to see if anyone else has an opinion

 

[aussie mark]

Yeh ill bump again.ive read tren can be hit and miss with hairloss