how does being shut down longer actually effect you worse? I mean sure it makes sense (to me) that if I would use 250mg weekly for 16 weeks that I would be anabolic but not have as many side effects as say 750mg weekly for 16 weeks.
But the kicker is you take some one doing a 250mg 16 week and assume that it would be harder to recover vs some one that does a 12 week 500mg weekly cycle realistically thats what most people do. So being on for 12 weeks at a higher dose is easier to recover than 16 weeks at a lower dose?
But when newbies like me here "SHUT DOWN IS SHUT DOWN" you think that it must be true. As an example Deca and EQ stay in the system (detection) for quiet some time that right there would make me THINK that it would be harder to recover than say a test cycle. Plus I hear "SHUT DOWN IS SHUTDOWN" but clearly people say 19nors are the worst to come back from.
But the kicker is you take some one doing a 250mg 16 week and assume that it would be harder to recover vs some one that does a 12 week 500mg weekly cycle realistically thats what most people do. So being on for 12 weeks at a higher dose is easier to recover than 16 weeks at a lower dose?
But when newbies like me here "SHUT DOWN IS SHUT DOWN" you think that it must be true. As an example Deca and EQ stay in the system (detection) for quiet some time that right there would make me THINK that it would be harder to recover than say a test cycle. Plus I hear "SHUT DOWN IS SHUTDOWN" but clearly people say 19nors are the worst to come back from.