18 year old considering a cycle.. have been researching for a while

[GetToDaChoppa!]

Your methodology regarding the acquisition of validation from an internet based community is injudicious at best. As pontificated by many the implementation of gear at your age is inadvisable.

Haha.. I love the pseudo-intelligence. Anyone who knows how to write would laugh at the redundancies within your writing. Besides, it's best to speak in a colloquial manner among your peers. Mind you, this is a bodybuilding forum, not a ivy league campus.

If it's all the same, I'm sure you impressed yourself - at most.

 

[rocko3927]

this is bull shit. the only supporting post is b-boi whom on another site posted the same pics as masterchief says are him at 18 and 160. b-boi on says this : ,"My cousin wanted me to post this for him - he might make an account soon. 20 years old, 157 lb, 5'8", lifting since he was 16, but started taking it really seriously around 6 months ago. " i copied and pasted that. below that comments are the 3 pics masterchief says are him.

 

[Not7fifteen]

Wow what a troll...

 

[GetToDaChoppa!]

=Dread Pirate Roberts;2737087]Total Crap and sorry Dan live in the stone age of muscle buliding.

His reasoning is that anabolic steroids controls cortisol's catabolic properties. Meaning...since there is less break down of muscle tissue within the steroid user, less protein is technically needed to replenish what has been lost. Technically, this is accurate. I personally stick to 1 gram per lean pound of body weight when I cut, and 1.5 on a bulk. You guys can keep your 2 to 3 grams per pound of (total) body weight as most claim is necessary.

Well, his reasoning is more sound than yours - which is nonexistent.

 

[3J]

Haha.. I love the pseudo-intelligence. Anyone who knows how to write would laugh at the redundancies within your writing. Besides, it's best to speak in a colloquial manner among your peers. Mind you, this is a bodybuilding forum, not a ivy league campus.

If it's all the same, I'm sure you impressed yourself - at most.

Though i agree that its best to speak in a colloquial manner wigth ur peers i think he takes pride in the way he writes. Leave him be. Shit if people dont seem to understand what hes saying maybe itll make their stupid asses read a book every once in a while

 

[masterchief1123]

this is bull shit. the only supporting post is b-boi whom on another site posted the same pics as masterchief says are him at 18 and 160. b-boi on bodybuilding.com says this : ,"My cousin wanted me to post this for him - he might make an account soon. 20 years old, 157 lb, 5'8", lifting since he was 16, but started taking it really seriously around 6 months ago. " i copied and pasted that. below that comments are the 3 pics masterchief says are him. here is the url: forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=123183761
check it out for yourself.

i guess the possibility of me being his cousin never popped into your head lolol

and the 5'8 thing was completely wrong, i told him to correct it

also

he's gonna need a study to believe this DPR.

why is it so bad that I want a reliable source to back up any claims made on here? ive seen cases of cycles going bad at young ages, but not if they knew what they were doing. everyone i've seen that says they started cycling at a young age says 'i don't regret it.' seriously.. get off of your high horse and show me some factual data before you go around telling people under 21 that they'll suffer for the rest of their lives because of AAS usage

and

And like everyone said, there is no guarantee you will be "just fine" from cycling at such a young age. You never know how a body will react. I cycled very young and I am under 30 years old and on TRT. I think you got plenty of solid advice from everyone here on the forum. To be your height and weigh 175, I know you have plenty of room for improvement. Hit up the diet and training forum here.

Looks also as if you are only training 3 days per week?? However, it still sounds like you are dead set with taking gear. Unfortunately you will be re-posting soon your results from your D-Bol only cycle and asking for help because your sweet titties are hurting. We will be waiting.

dbol wasn't mentioned anywhere in this thread, it seems like you were the one that made the mistake of a dbol cycle fortunately I didn't make that mistake and that is why I am here, to expand my knowledge

anyways, with all that said, i'll wait two years or so before I start cycling if it is really that detrimental to my health, thanks for all your input

 

[RJ]

anyways, with all that said, i'll wait two years or so before I start cycling if it is really that detrimental to my health, thanks for all your input

i love how you make a big fuss and than agree with us after all, even though we didn't show you any studies.

But for the record, you wanna know why i don't post studies? Because studies don't mean shit in comparison to real life experience.

And I never said it was detrimental to your health. I don't tout all that growth plate bullshit or any of that testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) crap. Reason I say your too young is you have tons of natty test running through you right now and you're a 160lbs. Why not take advantage of all that natty test instead of using synthetic hormones to do the same shit or a lil bit more.

Either way, you have bigger issues than steroids. Good luck either way.