mustanged77
Tren Freak
No
Although I appreciate your argument, I have to disagree with the example of your proof. Your model is not represented in any physiology text that I have seen. If you want my credentials, see earlier posts.
Where is the proof that LP negatively affects X? Also you can't have XD represent the dosage of dbol and X represent effectiveness of dbol. It should be something like: D+L=E
D= dosage
L= liver protection
E= effectiveness
But there is still no proof that liver protectants reduce the effectiveness of Dbol. And if it did, there is no proof that the amount(value) of liver protectants is directly proportional to effectiveness of dbol.
In other words, my liver may be protected with very little decrease in the effectiveness dbol.
Thats a chance I would rather take.
pinch yves said:It is scientific fact that liver protections decrease the efficacy of oral gear, albeit slightly.
Here:
Let ED represent the effective dose of dbol, Let D represent and LP liver protection
XD + LP -X < EDX
Whatever dosage of dbol(XD) you consume with liver protection (LP) minus (-) the effectiveness of dbol (X), with a metric undefined and case-based, for X, will be less than the effective dose of dbol without LP
Although I appreciate your argument, I have to disagree with the example of your proof. Your model is not represented in any physiology text that I have seen. If you want my credentials, see earlier posts.
Where is the proof that LP negatively affects X? Also you can't have XD represent the dosage of dbol and X represent effectiveness of dbol. It should be something like: D+L=E
D= dosage
L= liver protection
E= effectiveness
But there is still no proof that liver protectants reduce the effectiveness of Dbol. And if it did, there is no proof that the amount(value) of liver protectants is directly proportional to effectiveness of dbol.
In other words, my liver may be protected with very little decrease in the effectiveness dbol.
Thats a chance I would rather take.
