EQ Vs Deca

Your comparing apples to orange bro. From what I've seen, equipoise is shit compared to deca. Not only is equipoise half the potency of test, but it takes a min of 12-14 weeks to even kick in. Deca is a step lower from tren and is a preferred bulks that provides pretty decent strength gains. Deca is a 19 nor as well which makes it more of the powerful hormone.
 
I've stacked them both before with great results. I've also used them separately numerous times each, and prefer EQ to Deca. Whoever said that EQ takes 12+ weeks to kick in, obviously has never used it themselves. 4 weeks to kick in, max.
 
I've stacked them both before with great results. I've also used them separately numerous times each, and prefer EQ to Deca. Whoever said that EQ takes 12+ weeks to kick in, obviously has never used it themselves. 4 weeks to kick in, max.

Nice username, horsecock
 
eq/deca same?

who said deca and eq are basically the same?
hardly...I don't agree with the person who said eq sucks. eq is a quality muscle gainer. you might not pack on 20lbs with it, but the 8 or 10 you do will be very high quality. it does take a little longer than some others but I find you can keep most of what you gain from eq, unlike a lot of others.

I have however heard of some people leaning out on deca, but obviously diet, cardio, and lots of other factors involved.just my 2cnts.
do whatever the FCK you want to do.
 
when i stack eq i stack it with tren and test.Deca i can stack with only test.But depends what u lookin for.I prefer Eq(slower,steady,no aromatisation which means less bloat and you will keep 9/10 of what u gained from eq.Most of guys say deca because u put water weight easly(but that's not muscle) and gain strength and they think they'r supermans.But im not aiming to raise my ego but my lean muscle mass + the veins get's insane on eq.so...the choise is yours at the end...:naughty:
 
I agree there is always mix reviews on these two. I've tried decca once this past Feb, bc I knew it help with recovery from shoulder surgery. I thought it was ok, would been better if I'd ran it higher. Eq I've never used but just got some and will be taking it with test cyp. What gets me is I've seen it under cutting cycle logs, but several will say it's only a bulker?
 
who said deca and eq are basically the same?
hardly...I don't agree with the person who said eq sucks. eq is a quality muscle gainer. you might not pack on 20lbs with it, but the 8 or 10 you do will be very high quality. it does take a little longer than some others but I find you can keep most of what you gain from eq, unlike a lot of others.

I have however heard of some people leaning out on deca, but obviously diet, cardio, and lots of other factors involved.just my 2cnts.
do whatever the FCK you want to do.

I lost 22 pounds on deca/cyp... went from 24 to 14% bf, on a low cal carb cycling diet (3J Diet plan)

EQ and deca arent similar at all imo.
 
I love deca, but i love NPP way more. But your comparing apples to oranges on this one. They are both great compounds when it comes down to the nitty gritty
 
EQ is like D-bol, without the bloated sides.Similar strength gains.

I think you need test with both of deca and EQ.
 
Your comparing apples to orange bro. From what I've seen, equipoise is shit compared to deca. Not only is equipoise half the potency of test, but it takes a min of 12-14 weeks to even kick in. Deca is a step lower from tren and is a preferred bulks that provides pretty decent strength gains. Deca is a 19 nor as well which makes it more of the powerful hormone.

EQ does not take 12-14 to kick in. I feel effect EQ at 3 weeks. BF% must be low for best results.
 
Back
Top