rpwhit777 said:
So Mudge you basically are saying that for an extended cycle it is important to add an anti-aromatase, as opposed to running a blocker like nolvadex, in order to maintain a better T/estrogen ratio????
We need Billy Bathgate on this one, he runs Nolvadex through his entire cycles FWIW.
I am trying to formulate and grasp long term cycles and the like myself, because I am having issues simply with post cycle therapy, my body is acting practically as if I never had a break (I'm 27 so my natural levels are starting going downhill I'm sure).
You dont want to flat out shut down estrogen, but if you can block aromatase activity then you will retain a higher test level, so arimidex is looking like something I need to try out. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) can also be usefull, but you can shut down LH - and if you shut that down from my reading it is harder to get back than natural test levels, so use with caution.
I am collecting what I find and posting it here:
http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=18411
My
basic reasons for thinking most people dont really recover:
∙ Most cycles are never as good as the first
∙ I see no evidence to believe in receptor saturation
∙ If 2-4 weeks clomid was all it took, why are we not jumping right back on?