DirtyBird
New member
Whats up guys, i am new to the site and have e few questions i couldnt quite find in the newbie threads recomended on the site. I have read time and again that most knowledgeable steroid users swear by a test only cycle for a firt time Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) user. My question is why? I understand that taking test reduces symptoms of shutdown, and is the "building block" of all future cycles. But i experienced puberty enduced gynocomastia which has stayed with me since i was 15, I am now 21, 22 in feb. It is not sever, i have the lumps with mild puffiness, but nothing noticable by sight. I have read that Test aromatises at a pretty high rate. I do not want to aggravate my gyno. I have tried over the counter prohormones which did not affect my gyno at all, however the use of test scares me a bit. I have been researching for months! and i mean going on a year about what steroids might fit my needs. Primobolan sparked my interest becaue of no aromitisation, and its slow and well maintained lean gains. I thought about 500 mg of primo a weak along with a non aromatisable oral such as stanzolol at 50 mg a day would make a nice stack without any estro related sides. But i have been told that any stack without test is a waste. My maion question is why is Test so crucial. Please leave the flaming out, i am only trying to learn, and i have read all the newbie threads, but they have not answered all of my questions. If anyone could recomend something to me i woudl appreciate it, or atleast a point in the right direction for reasearch. Thanks again, i have read alot of contradictory information out there, andi was just hoping someone would help me. thanks again. Oh and the purpose of whatever stack i choose is to hopefully start in early April in prep for summer, I will be going to Brazil for a amonth for a capoeira( a martial art) event.
BTW
Stats
185
5'8"
21
about 7% BF
BTW
Stats
185
5'8"
21
about 7% BF
Last edited: