JohnnyB said:I've been wanting to try it, glad to hear it's good. How would it compare to ICN, Testoviron or Primoteston?
JohnnyB
BigAndy69 said:Just as good. Better than those underdosed ICNs that hit the market a while back.
.
StoneColdNTO said:Oh yeah....that one lot, that'll certainly ruin their reputation....LOL
There have not been any problems reported after that one. That will be a steroid myth that will float around for a long time.
BigAndy69 said:Well, it's very unusual for a real pharmaceutical company to have a bad lot. UG is a whole different thing
Myth? Hardly, I had 16 of those bad ICNs. Testovirons and Primoteston are more trustworthy
StoneColdNTO said:The "myth" I was referring to, is the one like you are perpetuating, that all ICN's are an inferior product because there was one underdosed lot. That's it, I'm not trying to deny that there was a bad batch, but you know damn well that was the exception and things are back to normal now.