Where would you like to expand your Steroid Related knowledge?
- Thread starter Austinite
- Start date
frank.tb
New member
I'm not rooming with you and doc...I'd actually like to get some sleep lol
frank.tb
New member
Austinite
New member
Yes! I like it.
Megatron28
Moderator
Austinite,
I always hear guys throwing out ratios saying gains are X% diet, Y% lifting weights and Z% steroids. There are some pretty different ratios out there. Do you have any thoughts on this?
I always hear guys throwing out ratios saying gains are X% diet, Y% lifting weights and Z% steroids. There are some pretty different ratios out there. Do you have any thoughts on this?
Austinite
New member
Not sure I gather what you mean. Can you give me an example?
frank.tb
New member
What about similar compounds with different sides? What's the cause of this?
Like eq, primo, mast, var, and Winstrol (winny) all have similar benefits but all have there own kind of signature sides....
Eq being muddy blood where primo is not noted for this side. Almost identical benefits, different risks.
Like eq, primo, mast, var, and Winstrol (winny) all have similar benefits but all have there own kind of signature sides....
Eq being muddy blood where primo is not noted for this side. Almost identical benefits, different risks.
Austinite
New member
Well, that has more to do with A:A ratio. For example Masteron and primo are very similar with the exception of mast being highly androgenic, unlike primo. You can get the same gains from either though.
Maybe we can talk about AA ratios?
frank.tb
New member
If that's the cause then hell yea
Just like var being less androgenic than it is anabolic? Producing more "mild sides"?
Austinite
New member
Well that's one reason. But like the earlier example, it's why Mast causes hair loss and primo does not. Anything activating the androgen receptors heavily is going to cause more sides. But their structure has to do with the AA ratio. For example, if you look at T-bol and D-bol, they are nearly identical, except Tbol was slightly modified, making it less androgenic. Otherwise they're identical.
Austinite
New member
Really? I'l be happy to do that, I just fear that the chemistry and verbiage will be difficult to translate for most.
frank.tb
New member
Sounds good brother...and yea lingo may be difficult for most, but at least the information will be there for anybody to absorb...
Megatron28
Moderator
Here is an example conversation that was had not too long ago.
Post by GoPro:
I used 750mgs test E a week, 600mgs test Prop a week in combo with the test E just to jump start it for the first 6 weeks for my last cycle. But it doesn't matter how much you use really if you are not dieting and training properly. 85% is diet, 15% is training, and only that lil 5% is gear. People think its a miracle drug that they take and get buff, but its not. I spend 1 and 1/2 - 2 hours a day in the gym, eat six meals a day that are extremely strict, and so much more. You are what you put into it.
Response from Pinnhead
Try 20% training, 20% diet, and 60% gear
Austinite
New member
I'm going to take this to PM because I feel I may upset some viewers.
skinnypete
Hammer Time
specs and best way(if possible) how to keep most gains after cycle.
Austinite
New member
That sounds really good. What is 'specs' ?
