iv seen the study and few others. context is also alot to consider for sure. if i can show study that shows letro shrunk gyno, it still doesnt mean its the best option off cycle ( a serm like ralox is in this case, or full removal IMO) i know we are not talking gyno, just trying to make point about studies.
I understand this is trt talk, but I feel that its not the way to go about it if with lowT. are you going to indefinitely take an AI slowly lowering estro and causing other issues to up test a little? atleast with a full out SERM run of clomid for a few months you may push production to point after the run you may stay functioning at a more decent level, and if not then its hrt for life if wanting to have better levels anyway.
I just dont see the point of running ai with normal estro levels to gain a little test boost. even if allowing hpta to be slightly manipulated, would you argue that an AI would have a better effect at stimulating the hpta or a run of a SERM?
for me i feel a serm is superior and without the worry of low estro.
not saying it has zero effect (though i feel minimal), i just dont see it as an optimal choice vs. a SERM run, before accepting hrt for life.
