Good job staying composed and imperturbable despite ongoing flames Gixxer. Lets occlude further discussion on this thread. I postulate you have imbibed the necessary criteria. Feel free to contact me with further queries.
sorry for the off topic question, but i gotta ask...
humdiddly... do you type out your posts with a thesaurus in hand (or
Thesaurus.com | Find Synonyms and Antonyms of Words at Thesaurus.com which blows thanks to all the advertising open) or like writing down variations on paper with a pencil? or do phrases like "I postulate you have imbibed the necessary criteria" just come naturally to you?
I see wording like this most in your short responses though, which made me that much more curious.
On Topic:
Gix... rj's original "jesus pick one already dammit!" comment honestly didn't seem that harsh. he had dropped a comment or two already, you'd received comments from a couple of other people. there's a reason why different people give different advice.... it is not always black and white.
You'll see very well respected and experienced vets on this board throw out totally contradicting recommendations quite frequently. the most common that comes to mind is regarding Aromatase inhibitor (AI). some say run it all the time. others say only run it when the sides hit or else you won't really know if/how they are hitting to begin with and could be hindering gains by limiting more estrogen than is necessary. others say run it but at super low doses and tweak as you see fit.
bottom line.... this is a "try it and see" game. you want to do everything as safely as possible, but when you get conflicting recommendations, hanging around continuing to ask which to go with isn't the thing to do. the thing to do is for that to spark your own curiosity. think "why would these guys do things totally differently?" maybe do some more research on your own and then make your own decision.
if you try to get spoon fed every step of the way you'll end just doing someone else's cycle and probably won't be as in tune with what is going on anyway.
going back to his comment... rj is an ass just to be an ass. if you were an ass back in the same sarcastic *clearly* fucking around kind of way, you probably wouldn't have gotten flamed. when you're an ass back and it is obviously out of anger... then people are like "dude, chill out."
anyway... just trying to point out a few things for you to consider.