Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act (All Prohormones)

EliteMuscles

Official Sponsor
Well everyone it looks like something really sad may be right around the corner, they are trying to ban EVERY prohormone. So once again it may be a good idea to start stocking up on pretty much all your favorite items. There getting real crazy, so who knows when all of this may happen..

WASHINGTON, July 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- In response to the introduction today of the Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act (DASCA) by Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), the leading trade association representing the dietary supplement industry, issued the following statement.


Statement by Steve Mister, President & CEO, CRN:
"CRN strongly supports the Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act (DASCA), a bill that will protect consumers by providing the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) with new enforcement tools to identify and quickly respond when new designer anabolic steroids are created and marketed as dietary supplements when they are in fact illegal drugs. This legislation will allow DEA to target substances whose chemical structures mimic other anabolic steroids and whose manufacturers and marketers promote their anabolic or muscle-building effects and give DEA new authority to remove them from the market as controlled substances.
CRN has consistently called on Congress and government agencies to enact and enforce laws that help eliminate illegal products masquerading as dietary supplements and to prosecute the criminals who manufacture and sell them. For example, CRN was instrumental in helping pass the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004, and has urged Congress to further tighten the controlled substance laws to prevent new anabolic steroids from being introduced. In December 2010, CRN, along with four additional dietary supplement trade associations, joined forces with FDA to raise awareness about the significant public health problems posed by adulterated products illegally marketed as dietary supplements and heighten enforcement efforts targeting those illegal products. Bodybuilding products unlawfully containing anabolic steroids are one of the categories receiving heightened review by FDA.
CRN is proud to work with Senator Hatch and Senator Whitehouse on this critical issue. Misbranded products that contain designer anabolic steroids present serious health risks to consumers, particularly young men who may be unaware of the dangers of anabolic steroid use. When marketers sell new unapproved steroids under the guise of supplements, it is not only dangerous for consumers, but disparages responsible dietary supplement companies producing and selling legitimate, high quality and beneficial supplements for sports nutrition and performance. We pledge to do what we can to help pass this important legislation."
Note to Editor: The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), founded in 1973, is a Washington, D.C.-based trade association representing dietary supplement manufacturers and ingredient suppliers. In addition to complying with a host of federal and state regulations governing dietary supplements in the areas of manufacturing, marketing, quality control and safety, our 75+ manufacturer and supplier members also agree to adhere to additional voluntary guidelines as well as CRN's Code of Ethics. Visit Council for Responsible Nutrition-The Science Behind the Supplements .
SOURCE Council for Responsible Nutrition
Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

July 26, 2012 Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2012 Introduced; Would Bulk Up Federal Anabolic Steroid Controls

By Larry K. Houck –

Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Sheldon Whitehorse (D-RI) introduced legislation on July 25, 2012, that would amend the definition of “anabolic steroid” under the Federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA&rdquo and expressly add twenty-seven additional anabolic steroids to schedule III. The proposed “Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2012” (S. 3431) (“2012 Act&rdquo would significantly increase Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA&rdquo control over drugs and substances that meet anabolic steroid criteria. If enacted, the 2012 Act would be the third major federal legislative action impacting anabolic steroids since 1990. Congress passed the Anabolic Steroid Control Acts of 1990 and 2004 that placed certain anabolic steroids into schedule III of the CSA, expanding DEA’s authority to regulate such substances.

Passage of the 2012 Act would similarly add twenty-seven anabolic steroids, their salts and esters, to schedule III of the CSA. Placement of anabolic steroids in schedule III subjects manufacturers, distributors, dispensers such as pharmacies and physicians, importers, exporters, and anyone in possession of the scheduled anabolic steroids to the applicable provisions of the CSA and its implementing regulations that establish registration, recordkeeping/reporting and security requirements as well as administrative, civil and criminal sanctions.

The 2012 Act would expand the definition of anabolic steroids to include a drug or hormonal substance (other than estrogens, progestins, corticosteroids and dehydroepiandrosterone) “derived from, or has a chemical structure substantially similar to” anabolic steroids listed under the CSA if: the drug or substance has been created or manufactured with the intent of producing a drug or other substance that promotes muscle growth or causes a pharmacological effect similar to that of testosterone; or the drug or substance has been, or is intended to be marketed or otherwise promoted in a manner suggesting that consumption will promote muscle growth or any pharmacological effect similar to that of testosterone. The 2012 Act would exclude herbs and other botanicals, “a concentrate, metabolite, or extract of, or a constituent isolated directly from” herbs or botanicals that are dietary ingredients for purposes of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

The 2012 Act would also authorize DEA to issue a temporary order for up to two years (that could be extended six additional months) adding a drug or other substance to the list of anabolic steroids in schedule III if it finds that the drug or substance satisfies the Act’s criteria as an anabolic steroid. Adding the drug or substance to the list of anabolic steroids “will assist in preventing the unlawful importation, manufacture, distribution, or dispensing of such drug or other substance.” The Act would also consider a drug or other substance not temporarily or permanently listed as an anabolic steroid in any criminal, civil or administrative proceeding arising under the CSA that satisfies the anabolic steroid criteria. This could occur if, for example, such product was promoted for muscle growth. The Act would also require anabolic steroids and products containing anabolic steroids to bear a label identifying such contents. Lastly, the Act would also subject violators to specific civil and/or criminal penalties including up to $500,000 per violation and imprisonment of up to ten years.

DEA Deputy Assistant Administrator Joseph Rannazzisi, stated in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs, “[t]he use of anabolic steroids or dietary supplements that contain anabolic steroids or designer steroids, in high doses that boost, alter or derive from testosterone may trigger numerous adverse health effects in the human body including liver toxicity, baldness, uncontrolled rage and heart attacks.”

The Council for Responsible Nutrition and American Herbal Products Association have issued statements endorsing the measure (here and here).

The 2012 Act has been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

FDA Law Blog: Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2012 Introduced; Would Bulk Up Federal Anabolic Steroid Controls

5***945;-Androstan-3,6,17-trione;
Androst-4-ene-3,6,17-trione;
Androsta-1,4,6-triene-3,17-dione;
6-bromo-androstan-3,17-dione;
6-bromo-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione;
4-chloro-17***945;-methyl-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17***946;-diol;
4-chloro-17***945;-methyl-androst-4-ene-3***946;,17***946;-diol;
4-chloro-17***945;-methyl-17***946;-hydroxy-androst-4-en-3-one;
4-chloro-17***945;-methyl-17***946;-hydroxy-androst-4-ene-3,11-dione;
4-chloro-17***945;-methyl-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17***946;-diol;
2***945;,17***945;-dimethyl-17***946;-hydroxy-5***945;-androstan-3-one;
2***945;,17***945;-dimethyl-17***946;-hydroxy-5***946;-androstan-3-one;
2***945;,3***945;-epithio-17***945;-methyl-5***945;-androstan-17***946;-ol;
[3,2-c]-furazan-5***945;-androstan-17***946;-ol;
3***946;-hydroxy-estra-4,9,11-trien-17-one;
17***945;-methyl-androst-2-ene-3,17***946;-diol;
17***945;-methyl-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17***946;-diol;
Estra-4,9,11-triene-3,17-dione;
18a-Homo-3-hydroxy-estra-2,5(10)-dien-17-one;
6***945;-Methyl-androst-4-ene-3,17-dione;
17***945;-Methyl-androstan-3-hydroxyimine-17***946;-ol;
17***945;-Methyl-5***945;-androstan-17***946;-ol;
17***946;-Hydroxy-androstano[2,3-d]isoxazole;
17***946;-Hydroxy-androstano[3,2-c]isoxazole;
4-Hydroxy-androst-4-ene-3,17-dione
[3,2-c]pyrazole-5***945;-androstan-17***946;-ol;
[3,2-c]pyrazole-androst-4-en-17***946;-ol;
[3,2-c]pyrazole-5***945;-androstan-17***946;-ol;

http://www.hpm.com/pdf/blog/s3431.pdf (For the full list without the *** for the isomer)
 
Would it be illegal to even posess prohormones if the ban is placed? Or does it just prevent you from buying them?
 
They will have the same consequences as possessing or selling testosterone if they are controlled substances, so yes it would be illegal.
 
From reading the OP's post, it seems like this CRN company is the one to blame. So basically, there are some nutrition companies that don't want designer steroids to be sold. After reading that, it seems to me that those companies are pushing legislation into the ban. Probably lots of dirty money involved in this. Big supplement companies that don't carry designer steroids can easily afford to pay off some politicians to bump out the competition that does carry these products. They can keep banning all these new supplements, but it doesn't really matter. There's always gonna be some guy out there creating a new steroid that is not on the list.
 
They have introduced this before. I don't think it will stick. Too much money in supplements.

Hopefully you're right. Real AAS are better, but they're also illegal. Personally I prefer the real stuff, but a lot of guys'll be REALLY pissed off if this law is passed.
 
Hopefully you're right. Real AAS are better, but they're also illegal. Personally I prefer the real stuff, but a lot of guys'll be REALLY pissed off if this law is passed.

This law has already been passed and takes effect on August 29, 2012.
 
So now people will start using safer options like injectables as the current line of designers were by no means HEALTHIER than alreeady scheduled hormones like test, deca, the basics...

This stuff lasted way to long as it was....simply was a matter of time. So now you are left with AndroSeries and black market AAS....both safer options than SD, Dzine, etc,....

-Matt
 
So now people will start using safer options like injectables as the current line of designers were by no means HEALTHIER than alreeady scheduled hormones like test, deca, the basics...

This stuff lasted way to long as it was....simply was a matter of time. So now you are left with AndroSeries and black market AAS....both safer options than SD, Dzine, etc,....

-Matt

Unfortunately some of us have already dealt with legal issues surrounding legit AAS so "legal" supps like SDrol were a better option.
 
Man if this passes that would be really, REALLY fast. It's like the olympic's pop up and WHAM HUUUUUGE BAN. Gotta love how "clean" sports are anyways and how butt hurt politicians are mad they lost some bets.
 
Unfortunately some of us have already dealt with legal issues surrounding legit AAS so "legal" supps like SDrol were a better option.
Well in your case --- get a script for testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) friend!

Then get to know the AndroSeries line in conjunction with TRT

-Matt
 
Back
Top