Enough with the taboo shit on Dianabol cycles

I cant believe I wasted my time reading this entire thread. All you needed to do was read the first page and after that everything just kept repeating itself.
 
Well i did a dbol only for 40 mgs a day for 4 weeks gained bout 17 pds lost probly 13 of it. Wish i had some test in that one.
 
I'm going to try 10 mg in the am for preserving lean mass while dieting, doing 14 days on/14 off. Just a little boost to hopefully keep the muscle around while dropping the blubber.
 
I of course agree that oral steroids get a terrible rep. Guys like Reg Park used just dianabol during the 1960's and look how they looked. Anavar is prescribed to cancer patients at extremly high doses for months and months at a time with no apparant liver damage as well. This is of course never mentioned.
 
I don't think the dbol only cycle is the best choice but definitely not the worst. I have seen studies where they give AIDS patients anadrol ridiculous dosages for months on end. I mean the one I remember was something like 300 mg a day. I have also seen plenty of cycles posted where there was a long use of orals. People like to use relatively high doses of anavar for long periods of time and it is a 17aa. Any normal person with a healthy liver is not going to have a problem at 10-15mg a day probably even year round. Shit people use this for a bridge all the time and it is recommended and a bridge is usual 10 weeks or more.
 
bigjay00 said:
6-8 weeks?!?!? dude, I mean no disrespect, but thats not even recommended with a real cycle.
liver toxicity is completely over rated and all these forums have brainwashed everyone into believing it.
 
i dont even like dbol...never really did much for me when i used it. test is superior, hands down, case closed....and maybe kick in some tren too lol ;)
 
mikeb19 said:
I had elevated liver values after two and half weeks of test E
test e isnt a 17a steroid . if you had elevated liver values it wasnt from 2.5 weeks of test e .
 
you have elevated liver values if you lift weights, so who gives a shit. i think test is the base of eery cycle but dbol only cycles arent as ineffective as people are made to believe. i did a low dose dbol only cylce and i gained strength and kept some size... wouldnt do it again but thats only because i love test so much ;)
 
I have to agree with guy who first posted this thread. Despite all the stuff you hear about needing to run test. with dbol, in my experience dbol only cycles do work. (That is not to say that dbol/test is not a great combination - of course it is. But dbol on its own works great for many people who use it sensibly).

For a new or moderate user, who is prepared to train hard, but wants to get some good gains, 30 to 40mg per day over an 8 week cycle can produce great results. After that, you can train naturally for a month, and hold most of your gains, and then start a new cycle for further gains.

Although no-one knows for sure what Arnold took, the word is that the guys of that area pretty much all were doing dbol only cycles (although the doses I have heard about were more in the 75-100mg per day range, which I consider to be too high). Dbol came in 25 mg tablets in those days.
 
The Republican said:
I have back in the day, and I would again today.

What kills me is when someone posts how they want to do a cycle yet they have an extreme phobia of needles (not simply being scared, but an actual phobia) the man is called a pussy and told that he has no business using steroids.

I say its a bunch of hogwash.

'no business' are strong words. However, one should never allow a fear of needles be a factor to go on a wrong cycle instead. If you put fear above health, then you have indeed no business running steroids. If you put fear above better gains, when choosing between 2 cycles with supposedly the same health risks; I can live with that.
 
Back
Top