Nolvadex no good for post cycle therapy (pct) ??

StoneColdNTO

Administrator
Nolvadex no good for PCT ??

I thought that Clomid and Nolvadex were basically interchangable for PCT.

I know DrJMW recommends it for PCT.

Now I see where Nelson Montana says it is no good for that purpose.

Let the debate begin......and please lets keep it civil....:D

http://www.steroidology.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19598

Nelson Montana said:
But Nolva does nothing to aid in recovery. It mearly blocks e at the breast site, making it great to prevent gyno and not much else. It's also similar in chemical structure to Clomid and may cause similar side effects, most notably, a decrease in ejaulate volume. (Yeah, I know CLomid is supposed to increase it. A total myth).
 
I used at 50% nolva 50% clomid for my last post cycle therapy (pct) and it worked WAY better than clomid alone ever did
 
that is why I don't come off. :D but I have used novaldex with success before. I felt the same when I was on clomid with less female side effects
 
Nolvadex for me!!!!... I think this is a subject that could be beat into the dirt a thousand times and still there would be room to debate.. I guess it all boils down to personal preference I have used both and prefer Nolvadex hands down!!!!
 
clomid is just too much ..my girl leaves for a few days every time ....funny thing is now I know why she's crazy........
 
Nelson Montana is totally wrong here! I'm living proof that Nolvadex as well as Clomid work for PCT. I'm not going to give you my whole life story here, but I started using steroids at age 18 and by the time that I was 20, I had 6 fairly strong cycles under my belt. My cycles included D-bol, Test Cyp, Deca, Test Enanth, Winstrol (winny), Anavar (var), and EQ. I never used any kind of ancillary drugs during or after the cycles. No PCT! How was recovery?....It was HELL! After each cycle, I continued to work out, but the work outs were a real struggle because my natural test level was extremely low. At age 20 I decided to quit steroids for good. I made terrific gains while on my cycles, but once the drugs cleared out of my system recovery was always something dreaded. It took forever to get myself back into a good anabolic condition. I continued to train 100% natural (steroid-free) for the next 15 years, yes, I said 15 years. Long time, wouldn't you agree? Anyway, after years of pounding the iron naturally and developing a very nice physique, I decided to get back into bodybuilding. Well, if you want to make maximum gains and build maximum muscle...STEROIDS are an absolute must...there's no way around it. Over the years, I kept my eyes on athletes and steroid use and basically sat back and watched how the media and the government blew everything out of proportion. To make a long story short, I became fed up with all the lies and bullshit and made a decision to get back in the game and live the life that I abandoned a very long time ago. I researched steroids like a mad scientist with a renewed passion for life. So, what was it that I did wrong in the past, NO PCT...it was that simple! At age 35, I started cycling steroids again and for the first time I used Clomid for post cycle therapy (pct). I couldn't believe it, it couldn't be real, but I wasn't in Wonderland, it was real...I had much more strength and energy for my intense work outs post cycle. I became a believer in using an ancillary drug to boost natural test levels once the drugs were completely out of my body. On my next cycle, I tried Nolvadex for post cycle therapy (pct) and it worked just as well as the Clomid, but I liked the Nolvadex a little better, because of the fact that Clomid made me a bit too emotional. Enough of that, as I said above, I'll say it again, I'm living proof that Nolvadex as well as Clomid work for PCT.

Nelson Montana is full of bullshit on this one!:D
 
First of all, this is a complex subject an done I write extesively about in my second book. It surely will not be settled here.

But let me address a few points.

Duanabol: Before you cry "Bullshit!" you must realize there are lots of reasons you may have recovered better the second time around that are irrrespective of the treatment you chose -- one being that you had a better foundation from training naturally for so long.

This is a debate in itself, but I believe Clomid is a sucky drug. Now I'm sure that someone will post one of the four known studies of how effective it is, but everyone of those studies are flawed. Clomid owers LH and raises SHBG. It also kills a lot of guys ex drive. It's very uncertain. Works for ome, not for others. But in cases where people swear it helped, how can they be sure? Howdo you know you wouldn't have recovered just as well without it? Lots of people do fine without it.

Also, reduced e can result in reduced gains, (not just water) but that too is a topic in itself.


Of the last 10 pros I spoke with, none use Clomid, for what it's worth.


Now as far as nolva goes, I'm going to say something that will make some people livid. But it's the truth.

Nolva is site specific. Contrary to popular belief (myth) it doesn't lower e very well and it doesn't raise T to any appreciable level, at least not much higher than T would increase over time anyway. Yes, it does raise LH, but LH secretion also increases estrogen -- more so in older men and men who are suppressed.

There is also a rebound effect to Nolvadex. Once you stop, e can shoot up higher than before.

Nolva also lowers IGF-1.


There are differences in anti-e'. They all don't work the same way. And proviron and A-dex work in a preferable way. (Although they too are disimilar). A-dex can easily lower e too much resulting in increased risk of heart attack, lower libido and lower LDL. Estrogen is also necessary in the proliferation of androgen receptors. Androgens bind better in the presence of estrodiol.

Nolva killed my dick as bad as Clomid and I'm not alone. But it may work for others. But I can't see it working all that well under the best of circumstances. But people use it to be "safe" so, it makes them feel that way. But Nolva is neither safe or especially effective. You can still getgyno using it (Ive seen it happen more than once). And using it control bloat is flat out dumb. It's easy to reduce boat. You don't need drugs. Besdies, increased water retenton soothes the joints and increases contractile strength, allowing for heavier lifting. Meanwhile guys use deca for their joints, and creatine for water restention, then take Nolva to stop the effects.

In general, anti-e's are overused. Arnold never used anti e's. They weren't invented yet. Nobody used them. AND NOBODY HAD GYNO BACK THEN. Arnold isn't big enough for you? You need more drugs than Arnold to get as big as you want? You're kidding yourself.

If you cycle right, know how to train, eat and sleep, PC, and even use certain supps you might not need any anti-e's at all. But if you do, Clomid is at the bottom of the list and Nolva isn't far behind. But if you're suseptable to gyno, I'd recomend Nolva, but you can still get the bad sides, so I'd use it with proviron. Better yet, don't use compounds or dosages that will cause gyno in the first place.
 
Nolva is a little more then site specific. It works best for me post cycle, but makes my knees and shoulders feel like i'm on winstrol alone. The one place it doesn't affect bloat/water retension that I've noticed is in my face. Clomid might very well be crap, but nolvadex is not. It works, it's cheap, has multiple uses, and is widley available.
 
i have never done a cycle yet so i dont know if this applies but, my test levels have been testes like 4-5 times and they are always around 500-580. After complaning about a low sex drive the doc put me on clomid at25 mg a day but i took 50 and the next time i had my bllod work done my test was at 1300 and my estogen was also high. S0 i dont know if this apllies to a cycle but clomid defianlty with out a doubt raises test levels, the funny thing is i sisnt feel any different.
 
All I can say is I used clomid and I used nolva.
Nolva worked better than clomid, at least it did not make me feel like an emotional 13 yo girl.
 
NElson you make some good points brother... I like the fact that you refer to the BB's of old... Is it true they didnt use any anti-e's back then???
 
rpwhit777 said:
NElson you make some good points brother... I like the fact that you refer to the BB's of old... Is it true they didnt use any anti-e's back then???

Anti e's weren't invented until the late 70's -- right around the time guys started getting gyno.

Another thing about Clomid, is it can give pro-estrogenic symptoms -- not suprising since it is an estrogen.

I think the reason a lot of people prefer Nolva is tha it isn't as offensive. But if you aren't suseptable to gyno, there's really no point. I see guys using Nolva after a Primo/winny cycle and swear it works great. Meanwhile, neither Primo or Wnny can convert to estrogen. In fact, Winstrol (winny) alone is a good anti-e. So saying that Nolva works well under those conditions is like saying taking carrot juice is great to prevent elephant stampedes, because I drank carrot juice and there weren't any elephant stampedes.
 
I will say that in my case I perfer nolvadex to clomid any day. I get as good or better recovery without any of the nasty clomid sides.
 
Clomid
Pharmaceutical Name: Clomiphene (as citrate)
Molecular weight of base: 405.9663
Molecular weight of ester: 192.125 (citric acid, 6 carbons)
Effective dose: 100-150 mg/day orally
______________
Nolvadex
Pharmaceutical Name: Tamoxifen (as citrate)
Molecular weight of base: 371.5212
Molecular weight of ester: 192.125 (citric acid, 6 carbons)
Effective dose: 20-40 mg / day orally

Info:
While practically similar compounds in structure, few people ever really consider Clomid and Nolva to be similar. Its not just a common myth in steroid circles, but even in the medical community. This misconception originates from their completely different uses. Nolvadex is most commonly used for the treatment of breast cancer in women, while clomid is generally considered a fertility aid. In bodybuilding circles, from day one, clomid has generally been used as post-cycle therapy and Nolvadex as an anti-estrogen.
But as I intend to demonstrate this is in essence the same. I believe the myth to have originated because Nolva is clearly a more powerful anti-estrogen, and the people selling clomid needed another angle to sell the stuff, so it was mostly used as a post-cycle aid. But few users really understand how clomid (and also Nolvadex, logically) works to bring back natural testosterone in the body after the conclusion of a cycle of androgenic anabolic steroids. After a cycle is over, the level of androgens in the body drop drastically. The body compensates with an overproduction of estrogen to keep steroid levels up. Estrogen as well inhibits the production of natural testosterone, and in the period between the return of natural testosterone and the end of a cycle, a lot of mass is lost. So its in everybody's best interest to bring back natural test as soon as humanly possible. Clomid and Nolvadex will reduce the post-cycle estrogen, so that a steroid deficiency is constated and the hypothalamus is stimulated to regenerate natural testosterone production in the body. That's basically how the mechanism works, nothing more, nothing less.
Both compounds are structurally alike, classified as triphenylethylenes. Nolvadex is clearly the stronger component of the two as it can achieve better results in decreasing overall estrogen with 20-40 mg a day, than clomid can in doses of 100-150 mg a day. A noteworthy difference. Triphenylethylenes are very mild estrogens that do not exert a lot, if any activity at the estrogen receptor, but are still highly attracted to it. As such they will occupy the receptor and keep it from binding estrogens. This means they do not actively work to reduce estrogen in the body like Proviron, Viratase or arimidex would (by competing for the aromatase enzyme), but that it blocks the receptor so that any estrogen in the body is basically inert, because it has no receptor to bind to.
This has advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantage is that when use is discontinued, the estrogen level is still the same and new problems will develop much sooner. The advantage is that it works much faster and has results sooner than with an aromatase blocker like Proviron or arimidex. Therefor, when problems such as gynocomastia occur during a cycle of steroids one will usually start 20 mg/day of Nolva or 100 mg/day of clomid straight away, in conjunction with some Proviron or arimidex. The proviron or arimidex will actively reduce estrogen while the clomid or Nolvadex will solve your ongoing problem straight away. This way, when use is discontinued there is no immediate rebound.
So which one should you use? Well personally, I'd have to say Nolvadex. Both as an on-cycle anti-estrogen and a post-cycle therapy. As an anti-estrogen its simply much stronger, demonstrated by the fact that better results are obtained with 20-40 mg than with 100-150 mg of clomid. For post-cycle, this plays a key role as well. It deactivates rebound estrogen much faster and more effective. But most importantly, Nolvadex has a direct influence on bringing back natural testosterone, where as clomid may actually have a slight negative influence. The reason being that Tamoxifen (as in Nolvadex) seems to increase the responsiveness of LH (luteinizing hormone) to GnRH (gonadtropin releasing hormone), whereas clomid seems to decrease the responsiveness a bit1.
Another noteworthy fact about Nolvadex is that it acts more potently as an estrogen in the liver. As you remember, I mentioned that clomiphene and tamoxifen are basically weak estrogens. Well, tamoxifen is apparently still quite potent in the liver. This offers us the positive benefits of this hormone in the liver, while avoiding its negative effects elsewhere in the body. As such Nolvadex can have a very positive impact on negative cholesterol levels2 in the body, and therefore too should be considered a better choice than clomid. It will not solve the problem of bad cholesterol levels during Steroid use, but will help to contain the problem to a larger degree.
Another reason why I promote the use of Nolvadex over Clomid post-cycle (as if being 3-4 times stronger and having more of a direct effect on restoring natural test wasn't enough) is because it's a lot safer. Not just because it improves lipid profiles, but also because it simply doesn't have the intrinsic side-effects that Clomid has. Clomid causes more acne for sure, but that's mainly because you need to use a 3-4 times higher dose. But Clomid seems to also affect the eyesight. Long-term clomid therapy causes irreversible changes in eyesight3 in users. Irreversible. For me that alone is reason enough to prefer Nolvadex.
Lastly, one should be aware that use of these compounds can reduce the gains made on steroids. Nolvadex more so than clomid, simply because it is stronger. Estrogen is responsible for a number of anabolic factors such as increasing growth hormone output, upgrading the androgen receptor and improving glucose utilization. This is why aromatizing steroids like testosterone are still best suited for maximum muscle gain. When reducing the estrogen levels, we therefore reduce the potential gains being made. For this reason one may opt to try clomid during a cycle instead of Nolvadex. Although I would imagine that the problem that needed solved would be of more concern, in which case Nolva remains the weapon of choice. It's a plain fact that there is a high correlation between gains and side-effects. Either you go for maximum gains and tolerate the side-effects, or you reduce the side-effects, and with it the gains. That's life, nothing is free.
Stacking and Use:
If problems of Gynocomastia or other estrogen related symptoms tend to pop up during a cycle the use of 20-30 mg of Nolvadex or 100 mg of Clomid daily should easily contain the problem, and be used until a few days after the problem subsides. For best results and the least amount of problems upon cessation it is best stacked with Proviron (50 mg) or arimidex (0.5 mg) for this duration as well. Its not advised that these products be ran concomitantly with the steroid for the entire duration of the stack, as this will reduce your gains. Instead cease the usage of anti-estrogens once the problem is contained, and should the problem resurface, simply recommence the use of the products in the same manner as described above.
Once a cycle of steroids is concluded one should always initiate a post-cycle therapy to help bring back natural testosterone as soon as possible. This will help you to retain the mass you gained. How this is done depends highly on the type of steroid used. If only orals were used, therapy should start immediately, even the last day of the stack. If short-acting esters or water-based injectables were used, therapy should commence within 4-7 days after last injection, and if long-acting esters were used then it should commence 1.5 to 2 weeks after the last injection was given. The length of the therapy will vary as well, from 3-5 weeks. The longer acting the product was, the longer therapy should be continued to make sure all suppressive factors are cleared before use of Clomid/Nolvadex is discontinued.
For best results, it is best stacked with HCG (Human Chorionic gonadotrophin), which functions as an LH analog and can help bring testicle size back up. HCG use starts the last week of a cycle, and on from there every 5-6 days (usually 1500-3000 IU) and discontinued 1.5 to weeks prior to the cessation of Nolvadex/clomid. The reason being that HCG itself is also suppressive of natural testosterone and should be out of the body before therapy is over, or it will inhibit natural testicle function. But I can not stress enough that HCG possibly plays a more important role in post-cycle therapy than clomid/Nolvadex. For Clomid and Nolvadex, doses are usually tapered down. Its best to start with 40-50 mg of Nolvadex or 150 mg of Clomid for the first week or the first two weeks, and then finish the program with 20-25 mg of Nolvadex or 100 mg of Clomid for an additional two weeks.
*************************************

Profile courtesy of BigCat
 
All I can do is give my personal results, i am not going to argue with anyone. First cycle was 1amp of testex every four days, with 20mg dbol the first four weeks. I used no clomid even though i had it, i wanted to see if i could recover without it, although i kept some gains and some strength i did lose some, and got very sluggish in the gym, and lost the desire to train. Now for the last four cycle i have used clomid only and usually am sporting good morning wood after about a week to 10 days, and don't get that sluggish feeling, and my workouts don't usually suffer to any degree. These cylces have included tren and deca, and although the degree to being shut down feels different depending on what drugs i was on, i always feel recovery setting in around the same time. Now i have never used nolva, as i never wanted to mess with something that seems to work for me. I never understood how nolva worked at post cycle recovery, I don't think i ever heard a good explanation, just like i never heard a good explanation on why to use adex post cycle. Can anyone tell me what the science behind nolva is, because i pretty much agree for the most part on what Nelson is saying.
 
The piece written by BIG CAT (posted by liftsiron) is typical of a book knowledge expert -- which is what BIG CAT is. He has never done Nolva, or Clomid, or steroids. That prattle was essentially "borrowed" material from Bill LLwellin. BIG CAT "borrows" from lots of places. That's what makes him an expert apparently.


Concerning the piece itself, some of it is correct, some of it is arguable, some of it is mearly speculation, and some of it is dead wrong. But how would BIG CAT know?

There are many intangibles that take observation and experience to sort out. Just going by what "the book" says isn't enough. "The book" is often wrong - and is always being revised.

Estrogen management is one of the least understood aspects of anabolic enhancement. Keep in mind, neither Nolvadex or Clomid are designed to supress aromatization. They are not meant to be taken by men. Their use has mostly been guesswork that has been manipulated into a psuedo-science by a few bright (but no necessarily accurate) individuals and then parrotted endlessly by teen age experts over the internet.
 
Back
Top