Anabolic Transdermals?

[TheDarkHalf]

I see a company called venom chat has some anabolic transdermals out - was just curious if anyone has heard anything positive or negative about them - or is it even possible to do a transdermal Dbol, Tren, Test, or Winstrol (winny)? I've obviously heard of transdermal test (androgel), but was curious about the others and if their molecular weight is right for absorption through the skin.

Prices are alright so I might just bite the bullet and give it a shot anyways. Reason I'm looking into it is because I already have some test that I'm going to be pinning in May, and this came along so I figured WTH might as well look into this a bit more and see what the deal is.

Hope I'm not violating any rules with this post... apologies to the mods if I am..

I honestly feel like transdermals, SARMs, and injection less technologies (http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/needleless-injections-0524.html) will be the future so I'm curious.

 

[halfwit]

Transdermal test sucks really bad for a lot of people due to absorption issues and it is made by the big pharma guys. I can't even imagine UGL transdermals... I'll stick with orals/injectibles personally for the time being.

That url refers to something TOTALLY different from transdermals by the way. It's a needle-less injection system using the properties of a Lorrentz force magnetic field to propel a piston containing the medicine into the skin using air. It's still an injection, but lacks a physical needle. Nifty either way though.

 

[dtownry]

bioject.com/

Penny stock too. Hmmmm...maybe we can all be rich. And I don't just mean in character and good looks

 

[halfwit]

bioject.com/

Penny stock too. Hmmmm...maybe we can all be rich. And I don't just mean in character and good looks

OH SHI-. Brb, grabbin' the daughter's piggy bank, time to become a bazillionaire!

 

[TheDarkHalf]

Transdermal test sucks really bad for a lot of people due to absorption issues and it is made by the big pharma guys. I can't even imagine UGL transdermals... I'll stick with orals/injectibles personally for the time being.

That url refers to something TOTALLY different from transdermals by the way. It's a needle-less injection system using the properties of a Lorrentz force magnetic field to propel a piston containing the medicine into the skin using air. It's still an injection, but lacks a physical needle. Nifty either way though.

Maybe you should have read what I wrote a little more clearly....see how I say INJECTION LESS TECHNOLOGY and then provide a link to it?? LOL went over your head there buddy I didn't need an explanation...just sharing new technologies that we might have access to the near future (no reason to think that transdermals can't and won't get any better either)

 

[TheDarkHalf]

bioject.com/

Penny stock too. Hmmmm...maybe we can all be rich. And I don't just mean in character and good looks

Might be worth it....drop 100 bucks....10000 shares....IF (and a big if) it goes up to 10 bucks a share...or more....yeahhhhhh buddy haha

 

[halfwit]

Maybe you should have read what I wrote a little more clearly....see how I say INJECTION LESS TECHNOLOGY and then provide a link to it?? LOL went over your head there buddy I didn't need an explanation...just sharing new technologies that we might have access to the near future (no reason to think that transdermals can't and won't get any better either)

Whoa there home skillet. You mentioned a new company that offers transdermal AAS and asked for opinions on it. Stating that transdermals (applying a solution to your skin) and injecting a medicine via charging the molecules of a solution through a magnetic B field are two COMPLETELY different things. I happen to be on testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) so I am quite familiar with transdermals as well as an electrical engineering major, so I know a thing or two about E&M principles too. I wasn't knocking your post, but to say I need to read it more carefully is borderline silly as I addressed both issues equally.

Happy Friday to you good sir.