I'm not hating on you mike, but you have a very specific set of demands when it comes to showing you why use of AAS at an early age is frowned upon here.
You want us to find you a long-term study regarding pubescent males that ran a 6 week course at slightly supraphysiological doses, and the effects on the HPTA. (The biggest risk isn't even that - it's the mental development that suffers FYI)
Think about that for a minute and realize that the odds of finding a single study under those parameters is going to be improbable at best. I too was part of the crowd that cycled hormones (I was too scared, how ironic) and out of the dozen or so guys that did cycle, 2 are not on TRT to this day.
Does that mean the other 10 did it wrong? Hell, I didn't even cycle at an early age and am on TRT - yet I still only have ONE obscure study showing the relationship between opiate abuse and hypogonadism that I had to spoonfeed to my doctor.
Or.... How about some folks win the genetic lottery and have a very robust pituitary gland. If you want more anecdotal proof, I wholeheartedly welcome you to surf through the hundreds of threads in the TRT forums from scared 19 year olds that have been shut down for a year and cannot get their HPTA restarted no matter what they do. The saddest part of that tragedy is that most doctors they see absolutely refuse to treat them for hypogonadism, but offer up antidepressants instead.
I feel for these kids, and absolutely cannot recommend AAS use to them given the risks they would be taking on top of the permanent changes they can do to their still developing brain. Any responsible adult/parent should feel this way.