I will interject an explanation and opinion here.
The God Jesus spoke of is the Jewish God. He came to fulfill the Old Testament, not undo it. Its the same God that had the tribes wiped out, woman and child, flock and land. Same God that wiped out 99.9% of the human population to "start over" with the flood. Same God Jesus represents.
your absolutely wrong...
we have to remember two things when it comes down to early christianity and judaim... what the human condition was, and what ultimate reality was
the traditional "jewish" god did wipe out tribes women and children, flock land, and whiped out 99.9 percent of the world...
the jewish god was violent, radically exclusive (u had to be a jew, be circumcised and follow strict purity laws (especially with the pharisees and the essenes) in order to be a part of the community.... the god of the jews was only for the people of israel
the god jesus spoke of was radically inclusive, radically loving, and charged the individual with an acceptance of a general community, instead of an exclusive... e.g. love thy neighbor.. or "call no man father".. the patriarchal motif of the jewish people was disbaned.. leaving everyone to be brother and sister to each other.. and giving women more equality...
women in the jewish faith had their connection with god only through their husbands.. the culture was based upon an honor/shame system.. males were to be the ones to bring and upkeep honor in the family, while women were the ones to make sure they didn't bring shame...
purity laws.. like who you ate with could easily shame u if you broke them... jesus did all these things...
he had a new concept of god...
so if u wanna say its the same god u have to say
the violent radically exclusive god of the jews = the peacful racially inclusive god of the christians..
sorry.. does not compute..
People seem to forget Jesus throwing tables, and chasing everyone out of the building at one point.
but he used no physical violence on the people in the temple.. just the tables... which is why the Sadducee plotted against them, he threatened their livelyhood
God is forgiving, when you ask for it. If you do not ask for it, he is not so forgiving. Quite a simple rule I thought. I do believe Christians are taught some things that are not 100% intended, such as to be complete panzies. Turning the other cheek serves a purpose, but so does busting someone in their jaw if needed.
turning the other cheek is what jesus taught as a main point in his teachings... so ur armcharing it if u wanna mend that to fit your needs... and god is forgiving to all he "loves his enemies" remember?
I read a guys story about when he was a kid he got into a fight in the church parking lot. The other kid had picked on him for years, and finally that day in the parking lot he stood up to him and beat the hell out of him. The mother was embarrassed and went to stop him but was stopped by the preacher. He said "You only have so many cheeks to turn".
good for the preacher.. he has still gone against christian principles... the principles of jesus
Thats how I see it anyways. Being a Christian is not about being dogmatic, or perfectly "kind and nice", etc,etc. Its about trying your hardest to make a difference for good in the world. Sometimes that path requires violence, such as with Hitler. There was only one way to deal with him.
agreed... yet u go against the "interpersonality" of god when stating such a thing
Now you ask, why do such horrible things happen to people? Such as the sodomy of a child.
This place is a warzone. Thats why. Things are allowed because we have to choose our own fate, we have to choose who we will serve. God does not send anyone to hell, its a personal choice. Just like when you break a law your sending yourself to jail. Its not the judges fault you broke the law.
You speak of child molestation? Well think about one thing...Under old school Christian laws that man would be beheaded, burned, hung, or some other form of death for his actions. Thus discouraging others from letting their minds wander into the dark perverse nature of the flesh.
In a "religion free" society, he gets a slap on the wrist, a few years in prison maybe, but then his life back...even though a child will never have a real life after that kind of trauma....This is America today...
What you have is God allowing people to have free will. Americas free will has been to push out Christianity, to reject God, and to label the faith all kinds of names and alter all the ways of life that once was.
Well part of free will is that you have to deal with the consequences of your choice. Voila, you have America as it is today. The consequence of generations past. A place where being a criminal pays.
The reason people protect criminals like that, such as child molesters....the reason people are strong supporters for anything anti-Christian(such as homosexuality, liberalism,etc) is because in doing so they make themselves feel that their own acts are not as bad, or more acceptable because someone else's is far worse or more extreme. Where as if people actually had to pay for such horrendous crimes as murder and rape the old fashioned way, it would become much less common and with that the focus would return to the smaller things.
This would point to the fact that child rapists are the direct result of the choices made to push God out. Not saying it never happened even with Christianity being the main controlling factor...but back then if a man raped a kid...he turned up dead, and cops didnt ask questions...Justice is Justice.
A rapist has no rights once proven guilty IMO a last meal of his choice, then he should accept the fate he earned....Humans have too many damn rights today.... and that is partially a problem.
Again this is just an opinion and example.
I agree each person has faith in something. Be it faith in God, or a faith that there is no God,etc. But most important is what kind of role that person plays to society. Do they improve the lives of others they are around ,or do they ruin the lives of others they are around? That is the question.
Also it is not judging. I do not judge a man, but I do carry out the judgement he places upon himself by his actions.