Is 2,500 IUs Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) twice a week too much?!

[Nanno]

Is 2,500 IUs HCG twice a week too much?!

My Dr prescribed me 2,500 IUs 2x's per week (intramuscular too?! thought hcg didnt have to be administered that way?) to come off a cycle of test.

Isn't this too much?

Also he didnt prescribe me an estrogen blocker. Is this a problem?

 

[iliftalot]

it can be administered IM or subQ. Yes you should be taking an Aromatase inhibitor (AI) while on hcg as it aromatizes, what does your PCT consist of?

 

[THE-DET-OAK]

thats a lot, especially after a light cycle of test only. the biggest thing you have to worry about with that much is aroma.

HCG stimulates Aroma in the leydig cells, here its harder for the Aromatase inhibitor (AI) to penetrate, because these are dense lipid cells.

 

[Hcc5881]

yes it is too much. plus it can desensitize the testes. true story.

 

[Stick & Move]

My Dr prescribed me 2,500 IUs 2x's per week (intramuscular too?! thought hcg didnt have to be administered that way?) to come off a cycle of test.

Isn't this too much?

Also he didnt prescribe me an estrogen blocker. Is this a problem?

Fuckin Doc's, What they hell do they know.

 

[Hcc5881]

when it comes to hormones, docs seem to be off often. i believe this is because the "practice" isn't "practiced" often due to all these government laws. hormones are probably one of the single most unpracticed treatment.

 

[THE-DET-OAK]

i agree on everything Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), except desensitization. its a myth.

 

[WindowCleaner]

1750-2450 IU a week would be more than enough. 3500 IU alone will give you high E2, 5000 IU is a joke.

 

[DADAWG]

400-500 a week every week will keep the nuts plump with little to no sides .

i just dont get this latest fad of waiting until the end of a cycle and then trying to pump up the nuts when you can run hcg throughout at a low-moderate dose and stop them from shrinking in the 1st place.

 

[WindowCleaner]

400-500 a week every week will keep the nuts plump with little to no sides .

i just dont get this latest fad of waiting until the end of a cycle and then trying to pump up the nuts when you can run hcg throughout at a low-moderate dose and stop them from shrinking in the 1st place.

Yup, and once you let the balls shrink it takes all that much longer for you to start making your own test. The pituitary starts making that LH, but the testicles aren't ready to respond. If you keep your balls plump you will start making your own test as soon as the pituitary starts back up.

Also, not sure if there's any truth to this, but they say when you let the balls atrophy they can become permanently damaged and will never output the same test level they use to. Needless to say I'm not trying to find out.

 

[UserAt204]

DAWG and oak are correct. Now I have done large doses after a cycle to stimulate testes basically as an experiment and have had others do it due to a heavy cycle(1yr on). I agree that small doses during is the best option but I also like using 5000iu pre pct.

 

[THE-DET-OAK]

The biggest reason to blast over a cruise of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), in scally's eyes, is the stimulation at the pituitary is different and more efficient when T levels are lower. meaning there is less inhibitory effect from high T levels, and high estrogen,

So it can do a better job at stimulating the pituitary, getting it ready to receive GNRH, the hormone that basically turns into LH and FSH.

On top of this we want to FULLY stimulate the testes, and 500iu a week will not give you a 1k T level.

either way will work, but on heavier cycles, I think the blast is necessary, especially with tren and deca, cause thats where they shut you down the hardest, at the pituitary.

Just my 2 cents.

 

[Nanno]

400-500 a week every week will keep the nuts plump with little to no sides .

i just dont get this latest fad of waiting until the end of a cycle and then trying to pump up the nuts when you can run hcg throughout at a low-moderate dose and stop them from shrinking in the 1st place.

I originally wanted to run HCG during but Doc told me I would b ok without it and I went with that bcuz at the time I couldnt find it for a good price. I plan on running it from beginning next time.


anyways tell me if this would be ok...
I have a 10,000 IU vial of HCG: 1,250 IU 2x a week for a month

My issue now is I dont have an estrogen blocker so will this be an issue even tho my cycle was only test cyp 100mg a week?

 

[Nanno]

Hey guys please gimme input bcuz I wanna start this HCG asap. I wanna plump my boys back up!! lol

 

[footballguy12]

i was reading a study and it said that over 250 ius two or three times a week, the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) loses its effectiveness. so id stick with 250 ius three times a week but considering that your already at your post cycle i think id do 1000 ius about four times a week. But thats what id do.

ill post the articles up later on. I know one of em is Swale's Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) protocol..

 

[iliftalot]

2500IU per week? way too much imo

 

[THE-DET-OAK]

i was reading a study and it said that over 250 ius two or three times a week, the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) loses its effectiveness.

^^^ thats not true

 

[Mudge]

Many do believe that overstimulating LH will cause desensitization, like a body part getting numb after hitting it repeatedly.

 

[Mudge]

i agree on everything Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), except desensitization. its a myth.

Is there anything to point to that, or is that just something you assume on feel alone? I never tried the megadosing thing and lower doses seem to work fine.

 

[Hcc5881]

Is there anything to point to that, or is that just something you assume on feel alone? I never tried the megadosing thing and lower doses seem to work fine.

i don't have any evidence to back up the desentization but i take juice legally. my doctor runs a youth clinic and is so knowledgeable that it blows my mind. he is the one that told me to be careful with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) due to desensitization. Could he be wrong? of course. but not likely with this guy. But unless I can find scientific evidence to present, it may be useless to report.