bfriedman1017
New member
Are the 2 comparable? Which gave better results when used alone?
I've used/using both alone(while on AAS) and can't tell much from either. Lol
I stay pretty lean year round now, but other than that, no sides with ghrp/ghrh compared to the gh sides.
I've done a lot of research on GH and I just don't see it being worth the cost unless your older using it for anti-aging. If someone would like to argue this please do because I would like to hear someone that takes GH to justify it's benefits.
I've done a lot of research on GH and I just don't see it being worth the cost unless your older using it for anti-aging. If someone would like to argue this please do because I would like to hear someone that takes GH to justify it's benefits.
I think the anti aging effects would be absolutely priceless for an old man Zeek don't blame you there!
DET it seems as though tanning would give you tighter skin and a damn good glow look at a fraction of the cost haha. And I could keep even leaner with a 3j diet which is still cheaper even with the tanning package. Not trying to be too much of a smartass bro just not seeing what the big deal with GH is.
Bump still wondering if peptides give same results with anti aging