SARMs S-4 is Here!!!! New Sponsor, Sarms Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've found no evidence that the medical community stopped experimentation with s-4 because of sides.

The only explaination I've found is that Ostarine replaced S-4 because "Ostrine was more marketable". Why...? I dont know..?

There is still a lot of controversy on the net about if S-4 is Astrine or not...or if s-4 is Ostrine. All I know for sure is that S-4 is not Ostarine.

Perhaps they didnt give s-4 a trade name.Just refered to it as S-4...

Any insight??
 
I've came to the conclusion that niether ostrine or andarine is s-4.

I believe S-4 is S-4.

Some people try to market it as ostrine or andrine tho.

The reason I ask is because I believe that ostarine isn't available and the sarms out there is actually andarine.

I would like to hear from sarms search.
 
The reason I ask is because I believe that ostarine isn't available and the sarms out there is actually andarine.

I would like to hear from sarms search.

You are correct Ostarine is not available.

I know for sure what they are selling is not Ostarine.
 
You are correct Ostarine is not available.

I know for sure what they are selling is not Ostarine.

YTHASHIN ,your doig the research are you planning on running s-4?

Just asking...I would like to hear the feed back from a vet like you.

I want to hear more on sarm's, using them as an pct aid
 
But it appears that andarine is almost the same as ostarine.

Yes...but I dont think Andrine is S-4 bro.

From what I've gathered S-4 is plain S-4.

S-4 is similar to Ostarine but I dont think Ostrine has the vision sides.

I'd like to hear some feedback from Sarmsearch tho....
 
Yes...but I dont think Andrine is S-4 bro.

From what I've gathered S-4 is plain S-4.

S-4 is similar to Ostarine but I dont think Ostrine has the vision sides.

I'd like to hear some feedback from Sarmsearch tho....

RUI just posted that there SARMS was Andrine.

Does it still basically do same thing?

I wanta know more for post cycle therapy (pct) as well....interesting
 
Here we go...

Who know if this is correct though....

S-4:
S-4 = Acetamidoxolutamide = Andarine = GTx-007 = (S)-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide

S-1:
S-1 is also NOT Ostarine.
S-1 = S-3-(4-fluorophenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide
Basically there is Fluorine in place of the NHAcetyl group on the S-4 molecule.

Ostarine:
Ostarine is NOT S-1 or S-4
Ostarine is not characterized by an S-X name. Ostarine = MK-2866
The Ostarine molecule has a CN group in place of the NO2 group and the NHAcetyl group on S-4 (Andarine).

True Ostarine is NOT currently being sold by anyone at this point as far as I know. What the research companies are selling is S-4 (Acetamidoxolutamide or Andarine). S-4 was developed by GTx and used in phase 1 clinical trials before Ostarin. GTx did not move any further with S-4 but decided to move forward with Ostarine and went into phase II trials.

Also, the dosage is proof that what is being sold is S-4 not Ostarine. S-4 (Andarine) was being tested at 1-3mg/kg of body weight per day which is what most people who have used S-4 have needed to take in order to see gains. However, Ostarine in the phase II trail was only used at 1 or 2 mg per day (for a human, not an animal) and results were seen.

For some reason some research companies are selling S-4 and saying it is the same as Ostarine. This is NOT TRUE, S-4 is NOT Ostarine, they are selling Andarine (Acetamidoxolutamide), they even show you a picture of the molecule or write the chemical formula which correspond to Andarine NOT Ostarine.
 
SARMS Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Reviews Continued

From Article: "I also think that S-4 has a strong potential for use in post cycle therapy (pct). It doesn’t appear to inhibit the HPTA, and is a nice anabolic. I can imagine people making a full recovery using my post cycle therapy (pct) combined with S-4 and losing literally none of their gains (although they’d probably drop some water weight, I suspect they wouldn’t lose any muscle)."

This seems so interesting. I ordered my SARMS today and going to try it post cycle therapy (pct).

1. What you think?
2. OK with Clomid and HCGenerate, And HGH?
3. I was thinking of starting same time as other post cycle therapy (pct) drugs. good bad? opinions?
 
SARMS Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Reviews Continued

From Article: "I also think that S-4 has a strong potential for use in PCT. It doesn’t appear to inhibit the HPTA, and is a nice anabolic. I can imagine people making a full recovery using my PCT combined with S-4 and losing literally none of their gains (although they’d probably drop some water weight, I suspect they wouldn’t lose any muscle)."




This seems so interesting. I ordered my SARMS today and going to try it PCT.

1. What you think?
2. OK with Clomid and HCGenerate, And HGH?
3. I was thinking of starting same time as other PCT drugs. good bad? opinions?

It works great in PCT....
 
SARMS Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Reviews Continued

From Article: "I also think that S-4 has a strong potential for use in post cycle therapy (pct). It doesn’t appear to inhibit the HPTA, and is a nice anabolic. I can imagine people making a full recovery using my post cycle therapy (pct) combined with S-4 and losing literally none of their gains (although they’d probably drop some water weight, I suspect they wouldn’t lose any muscle)."

This seems so interesting. I ordered my SARMS today and going to try it post cycle therapy (pct).

1. What you think?
2. OK with Clomid and HCGenerate, And HGH?
3. I was thinking of starting same time as other post cycle therapy (pct) drugs. good bad? opinions?

little bump
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top