SARMs S-4 is Here!!!! New Sponsor, Sarms Search
- Thread starter Sarms Search
- Start date
- Status
That is correct, most experience negative vision sides when use more than 100mg daily.
stilltryin
digging out of a hole
They are definately cheaper than RUI. I have never used SARM S4 but I may consider it after reading this thread. Im sure there is a log somewhere on this site of someone who used it
There is plenty of feedback on OLM, ProMuscle and EF and yes their S4 is cheaper than Lion and they were the first research chem company to offer it.
Needtogetaas
New member
I got some blurry vision when going up over 100mg ed. I have also gotten this some kind of effect when going over 100mg clomid ed as well. Its another one of them things where more is not always better and once you get up over 100mg ed is when you start getting sides outweighing the gains.
Needtogetaas
New member
I feel its great for people who are on Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) doses and want to add a little something more. HAs many other uses as well.
Needtogetaas
New member
From what I hear Lion's a great sponsor with good prices and service on a lot of other stuff. Its good to have a few places we can all pick from for different products and get the best deal,service,prices for all of them.
I'm definitely thinking about giving S-4 a try. I just want to make sure there are no other side effects.
It doesnt seem to make sense that the medical community trashed s-4 just for some blurred vision.There has to be more to it. Perhaps it was just that a pharmaceutical company bumped another. I'm curious....
It doesnt seem to make sense that the medical community trashed s-4 just for some blurred vision.There has to be more to it. Perhaps it was just that a pharmaceutical company bumped another. I'm curious....
Been doing some more research on SARMs. The more I read about S-4 the more intrigued I become...
There are multiple potential uses for it...
S-4 may be the "Bridge" we are looking for after a cycle during post cycle therapy (pct) and between cycles.
We are looking at a substance that will not suppress your HPTA and help you keep almost all of your gains and maybe add to them.
Many people report fat loss, muscle tightness/hardness and a little bit of muscle gain (few pounds) but completely dry quality gains...
Still the only side effects that I've found so far are reports of slightly blurred vision and light to darkness sensitivity (kind of like a camera flash went off).
Anyone else do some research?
There are multiple potential uses for it...
S-4 may be the "Bridge" we are looking for after a cycle during post cycle therapy (pct) and between cycles.
We are looking at a substance that will not suppress your HPTA and help you keep almost all of your gains and maybe add to them.
Many people report fat loss, muscle tightness/hardness and a little bit of muscle gain (few pounds) but completely dry quality gains...
Still the only side effects that I've found so far are reports of slightly blurred vision and light to darkness sensitivity (kind of like a camera flash went off).
Anyone else do some research?
Mr.Happy
New member
The medical community never trashed it, this stuff is still being actively research by HUGE pharma companies.
Mr.Happy
New member
ther are many different SARMs, S4 is the one that has had the best results that would apply to BB.
check out the GTX website, pretty cool stuff.
GTx. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs)
ther are many different SARMs, S4 is the one that has had the best results that would apply to BB.
check out the GTX website, pretty cool stuff.
GTx. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs)
Yes I know there are diffrent types of SARMS. The two that I've seen mentioned in the Bodybuilding world are S-4 and Ostarine. S-4 is a first generation SARM that the medical community stopped experimenting with . Now they are experimenting with the second generation SARM "Ostarine".
S-4 is not any superior for BB results then Ostarine.
My questions are:
Are there are any additional side effects that we dont know about here? Is the vision side effect the only reason why they trashed S-4 or did they trash it for another reason other then for side effects?Is it hard on your liver?blah?blah blah?
This is a drug that only made it through the first stage of medical testing. I want more info....
Says who?
Are you going by some post that have been circulating the forums which claims the S4 aka Acetamidoxolutamide is Andarine?
Ostarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(S)-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide
AKA Acetamidoxolutamide or S4, SARMs-4, this is what Sarmssearch sells
Andarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(2S)-3-(4-Fluoro-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide
AKA S-1 and I have no clue who is selling this type of Sarms ????
IMO Andarine or S-1 is not as potent as S-4 ( acetamidoxolutamide = prefer to use its chem name instead of using the brand name given by a pharm company )
Last edited:
Who said this is for human use anyway?
Is all for research use ONLY as far as I know.
I know if I were a sponsor and someone asks me these type of questions it will immediately throw a red flag and I would not sell him/her anything!
Sorry if I sound to harsh, just saying ....
I'll tell you something CHAVO. I'm trying to learn what I can about S-4 and SARMS in general. There is a lot of false information on the net. Some research companies are trying to sell S-4 as Ostarine.
They are in fact two different substances...
Nice links by the way... Wikipedia..LOL...anyone can edit wiki.
I posted a link from "Medical News" that states "S-4 is a nonsteroidal, arylpropionamide compound that activates certain androgen receptors, while having no effects or acting as an antagonist at others. GTx conducted a Phase I trial of S-4 about five years ago, but later dropped the compound in favor of a second-generation agent with the trade name Ostarine, which has completed Phase II trials in cancer cachexia and chronic sarcopenia".
Now if you would've read some of the previous posts and read the links you wouldve seen this.
I've seen it mentioned that S-4 is Andarine. I'm not sure if they are the same substance or not. There is a lot of false information out there. This sponsor has not given any false info...but that info is out on the net.
I'm trying to sift through the bullshit...You can either help or not. I dont give a fuck either way.
They are in fact two different substances...
Nice links by the way... Wikipedia..LOL...anyone can edit wiki.
I posted a link from "Medical News" that states "S-4 is a nonsteroidal, arylpropionamide compound that activates certain androgen receptors, while having no effects or acting as an antagonist at others. GTx conducted a Phase I trial of S-4 about five years ago, but later dropped the compound in favor of a second-generation agent with the trade name Ostarine, which has completed Phase II trials in cancer cachexia and chronic sarcopenia".
Now if you would've read some of the previous posts and read the links you wouldve seen this.
I've seen it mentioned that S-4 is Andarine. I'm not sure if they are the same substance or not. There is a lot of false information out there. This sponsor has not given any false info...but that info is out on the net.
I'm trying to sift through the bullshit...You can either help or not. I dont give a fuck either way.
Needtogetaas
New member
Lets face it bro the medical community does want ever makes the big drug companies the most money. Its been that way for decades now.
- Status
Similar threads
