why are you on a thread about peptides then ? "mr experience" !! have you dropped a thousand dollars on multiple stacks of peptides and tested them all out on yourself ? I doubt it; but i have
I dont use garbage
why are you on a thread about peptides then ? "mr experience" !! have you dropped a thousand dollars on multiple stacks of peptides and tested them all out on yourself ? I doubt it; but i have
How dare you give slin advice tell newbs to use clen and other shit you know nothing about.
i know nothing about ?? really .
the only advice i see you giving is BS joking around crap , like in regards to insulin you say
"The big guys I know do 10 iu of slin and eat bananas pre workout" <--- lol , really , that just F'ing great
i learned ling time ago dont believe everything you read. I fucked my body up when i joined here
well I'm assuming the context of that statement is you fucked yourself up with AAS use . hmmm , i guess roids are somewhat toxic after all , huh. told you so
resort to a comeback huh .resort to a comeback
I've researched it and researched it and researched it and everyone keeps saying IGF-1 will not cause hyperplasia or dividing of cells.
A lot of people however do claim to get results with peptides such as IGF-1... this couldn't be just a placebo affect?
However for everyone that seems to get results their seems to be 10 that says ALL igf-1 is fake unless it's pharma grade which is thousands for a single mg
Do you guys think research grade IGF-1 is g2g with one of this board sponsors? Or is it bunk like everything else out there? I REALLY want to try out IGF! But I fear it's impossible to get your hands on anything that would actually have a biological effect.
Someone prove me wrong please haha.
Interesting thread.
As far as I know, there is zero scientific evidence that either HGH or IGF-1 stimulates muscle growth in healthy adults. Yes,all the pro BBers will say another thing but I do think that it's some what difficult do separate the effect of HGH/IGF-1 from 3 g of test, 1 g of Deca, 1 g of tren and 50-100 mg of Dianabol or Winstrol a day.
Not saying it's money down the drain, but compared to god old testosteron it has very little evidence regarding building muscle. Would be interesting if someone can post some hard facts regarding IGF-1 and muscle growth, other than that the big guys do it.
/Bruce
Thanks 49ER.
Do you mean different humans and makes all the differenser as in muscle growth? Or some other game changer as fat burning qualities etc?
Strange that its never shown any such differences in scientific litterature.
/Bruce
What really comical is when 49er and Matt start hating on each other...
Interesting thread.
As far as I know, there is zero scientific evidence that either HGH or IGF-1 stimulates muscle growth in healthy adults. Yes,all the pro BBers will say another thing but I do think that it's some what difficult do separate the effect of HGH/IGF-1 from 3 g of test, 1 g of Deca, 1 g of tren and 50-100 mg of Dianabol or Winstrol a day.
Not saying it's money down the drain, but compared to god old testosteron it has very little evidence regarding building muscle. Would be interesting if someone can post some hard facts regarding IGF-1 and muscle growth, other than that the big guys do it.
/Bruce
umm , one of the reason that steroids like Tren actually work and increase muscle size is because those steroids are responsible for an increase in IGF1 production.
no scientific evidence ? any basic text book on human biology tells you that IGF is responsible for cellular growth (including muscle cells)
Research igf is not the same you cannot say that some research igf is going to come anywhere close to the muscle building effects of tren. Ive heard lots of good things about it in the past as far as great pumps looking fuller but real igf makes you grow like crazy
i'm not talking about research IGF . I'm talking about real IGF thats produced in your liver , and produced in your liver at higher amounts when you take things like tren (do you have any clue how tren actually builds muscle , prob not, its not F'ing magic , its a biological and chemical process )
fuck man, I've said it 100s of times on these forums , that research peptide IGF is not 'real' IGF
But yet you compare it shouldnt something with the name igf be more potent than tren? Dont mislead people and tell them to stack igf with other shit because the results are probably not what they are expecting
dip shit . the only thing i was comparing was saying that Tren makes your body produce more natural IGF1 and thats one reason why tren is effective at building muscle.
i wasn't comparing research IGF to Tren. your A.D.D is out of control , you should seek medical help