test/EQ or Test/deca, opinons?

which one had more results

  • Test/EQ

    Votes: 22 62.9%
  • Test/deca

    Votes: 13 37.1%

  • Total voters
    35
i am on test/eq right now, and to be honest...i think deca is better choice..
 
Test & EQ for me. EQ coverts less, has less sides, and has greater quality muscle gains then Deca. EQ just takes longer to show results - but well worth the wait IMO. Deca belong in the trash can.
 
if you're gonna use eqiupose or deca you're gonna have to use high dosages....that shits too shy in the beginning

take 800mg/week and it'll come in probably sooner than you think
will build up faster


as far as test hey take that shit and your dick will pop up 3 hours later,,,that shows that its workin
 
Each would have its benefits but I loved Test/EQ because the EQ made me eat like a horse...good for bulking.
 
SprtNVolcoM said:
Test & EQ for me. EQ coverts less, has less sides, and has greater quality muscle gains then Deca. EQ just takes longer to show results - but well worth the wait IMO. Deca belong in the trash can.


Converts to what estrogen? I would think eq aromiitizes more than deca. I think fatter guys will probably like eq a little more, and the leaner guys may enjoy the deca a little more. That is just my opinion, i am not terribly lean, and always looked like a balloon on deca, although i never got great gains from eq, it didn't make me look to bad even when eating everything in sight.
 
jcp2 said:
Converts to what estrogen? I would think eq aromiitizes more than deca. I think fatter guys will probably like eq a little more, and the leaner guys may enjoy the deca a little more. That is just my opinion, i am not terribly lean, and always looked like a balloon on deca, although i never got great gains from eq, it didn't make me look to bad even when eating everything in sight.

Yes, estrogen. As far as I know, EQ aromatizes less than Deca.
 
SprtNVolcoM said:
Yes, estrogen. As far as I know, EQ aromatizes less than Deca.


The water retention from deca is not from aromitization, this is why adex does nothing for it.
 
Bob Muscles said:
which cycle has more benifits and keeping gains??

Im not sure if this is right you can double check with jc or sc in this thread but I heard eq isn't very efeective until you get down to 8-9%BF and helps make you leaner where deca will hel-p you bulk. Once again I heard this on another board so double check it.
 
Dlove said:
Im not sure if this is right you can double check with jc or sc in this thread but I heard eq isn't very efeective until you get down to 8-9%BF and helps make you leaner where deca will hel-p you bulk. Once again I heard this on another board so double check it.


I think you have EQ and Winstrol (winny) mixed up......
 
I dont know what most of you are talking about ... Bold propinate (for instance) is GREAT for bulking! I've seen very advanced and conditioned users put on 1&1/2 to their legs and over 3/4inch to their arms in less than 4wks using Bold Prop/Ace, & Trest Prop.

Bold prop/Ace is not so common around most parts though, so the usual Bold esters are used which take a while to kick in. If I'm not mistaken (I forget the ester) Bold has one of the longest half lifes of any AAS. That's why most people dont see "normal" gains so to speak and EQ cycle will take you well past 16wks.

I like EQ ... its far superior to DECA, IMO, hands down. I've used both many times & that has been my conclusion - just my opinion ... I am intitled to it.

Oh, & I also find EQ to produce better quality gains which seem to be easier to hold onto post cycle. I dont classify DECA bloats/water retention as "GAINS." You lose most of it during post cycle therapy (pct) anyway ... to answer your quesiton Bob Muscles.
 
I think its up to the individual to try them both and decide...as you can see the opinions vary GREATLY. Look at it like this, EQ is test derivative and deca is a nor derivative. They are anabolic via different pathways. If you go the deca route, be prepared to handle progestin sides. Adex and nolva wont do much for deca induced gyno trust me. EQ aromatizes more than deca...but it seems that deca shuts your HPTA down much more than a comparable dose of EQ would. They are both good choices. Id tend to use deca for bulking simply due to the water you will probably hold and the fact that it cant be controlled with adex. Id tend to use EQ for cutting or below ~10% BF just because the vasularity and (debabtable) hardness it seems to bring about are better apreciated if you can actually see it through your bodyfat.
 
Dlove said:
Im not sure if this is right you can double check with jc or sc in this thread but I heard eq isn't very efeective until you get down to 8-9%BF and helps make you leaner where deca will hel-p you bulk. Once again I heard this on another board so double check it.
What you'll notice with EQ is a higher count of red blood cells. That's where vascularity comes from, the extra blood cells in your body. More red blood cells, more oxygen provided to your muscles, faster the repairs.
 
u know ...both test/eq and test/deca will work without a doubt.

i know this is oldschool...but it also heavly depends on how good you train and your nutrition.

nothing can replace that guys.
 
Back
Top