Do you think that the GH is responsible for the size seen today or is it the slin or a combo of both. I think that igf-1 is causing a lot of the size differences seen today. The combo of all of those things is making a huge difference, but would running an amount like 12iu of pharma gh yield size on its own or would you also need it to work in synergy with slin to get size? I study a lot about AAS but I do not know much about the muscle building properties of GH on its own. I know what it does for recovery, skin, hair, and fat loss, but not a lot of people take high enough doses of real gh to report muscle gain.
i never lifted weights.. ever, until i found this place. just boxed.
letting you guys in on something here - my father was a body builder in the 80's and 90's..
so the old man had all the magazines and lit ( pre internet, kids)
when i thought about lifting, i started looking up the sport on the www in the last couple years..
the one thing that has really turned me off from body building- are the fucking body builders of today.
its pretty obvious to me that insulin and GH are the two things that ushered in the era of the size freaks and killed the classic body builder form..
these guys look ilke they're carrying babies, they look pregnant as all hell
the side effects don't stop there - this "palumboism" is a real fucking treat f0r everyone to look at - and a lot of those guys will continue to climb on stage with these strange looking orc / troll bodies that look like something of a different species than even human..
arnold himself called out the sport - that body building has lost its way
to be honest.. id rather look like i do right now, than to ever be rocking anything like that fucking GH gut