tyhigs said:Now all you need to do is point the source to this thread, and he will see that it is on him, not the customer. I wonder who this source is anyway. hmm
StoneColdNTO said:IMO....the source should have to wait, after all he did receive the money order, not the customers fault it got flushed.
BTW, why in the hell would someone start flushing paper down the can anyways.....LOL !!.....damn good thing he never sent cash.
ironmaster said:I would need to know one more thing. What is the nature of the relationship between the customer and the source.....is this a first time deal or a regular thing?
If this was my favorite guy who had always done me right in many transactions, I'd sure as hell send him some money. Good, honest dealers are hard to find. However, if it was a first time kind of thing, I'm keepin my money.
gorilla_boy said:So after 30 days there is no cash surrender value to the money order?
If that's the case, wait 30 days and make good on your deal. You did get the shit and you know 100% he didn't get the money/cash the MO.
If you get the money back and he didn't get paid, you're a reverse scammer.
He was a dumb shit for leaving the MO where a child could get a hold of it but he did right by you and you should do the same.
wayne and zeus said:Exactly
Also was the $2250 sent to this same source?
BiggieSwolls said:All intentions were on the consumers part to re-send the source the MO when the post office made the new MO available in 30 days. There was never any idea in the consumers mind to keep the money from the money order. The issue was that the source was basically saying "I know I lost the Money Order, but you have product and now I want my money" but the source knew full well that the $600.00 MO cannot be re-issued until 30 days is up.