China_Wall
New member
probably wasn't the tren messing with your hairline bro... more than likely Winstrol (winny) was the culprit... but test can cause ur hair to thin out early too if ur predisposed to it
cycle look ok though? any idea on the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) side of things
IMO the "Slow and Steady" cycles yield more results and you keep more of your gains from these type cycls than you do by using ungodly amounts of gear for 10-12 weeks,i dicussed this with one of the senior mods on here,and he was explaining the slow and steady cycles to me,and i also like this course of cycle running,
I would rather run moderate doses,for longer cycles,than to run high doses for shorter cycles,you keep more of your gains doing it this way from what ive learned and talking with alot of people who do this type
What do you consider a longer cycle and at what does?
imo personal experience I'd have to agree with your gym friend.. My first cycle I gained almost 30 pounds, second maybe a hair over 20, third about 15-18, fourth around 12 and ive gained about 10 so far and its week 6.5 in my fifth cycle..
so ur up 80 lbs from when u first startin runnin gear? impressive bro...imo personal experience I'd have to agree with your gym friend.. My first cycle I gained almost 30 pounds, second maybe a hair over 20, third about 15-18, fourth around 12 and ive gained about 10 so far and its week 6.5 in my fifth cycle..
yeah but what i'm trying to gauge is has this slowing in results come from the fact you are getting close to you natural limit and as such growing beyond that becomes more and more difficult or is it that the body has become used to the steroid itself!!
say if you lost everything you had gained or even did 7 cycles without lifting or gaining, then did a proper cycle r u saying you would just gain 5 Lbs for example from that cycle because the body is more immune??? I'm starting to think it woul be somewhere at least closer to the 20LBS
so ur up 80 lbs from when u first startin runnin gear? impressive bro...
so then why do people say dont take a cycle too early and get to your natural potential first if steroids will always help you get bigger just the same??
Can't really find and decent answer on this one and I can see reasons why and why not on both sides.
do steroids loss the effectiveness as our bodies receptors become used to their presence? or is it simply the case that cycle by cycle if you are getting bigger, it simply becomes harder to grow as you come close to or push your bodies natural boundry??
People say that your first cycle is always going to be your biggest and best and also the need to start on low doses and work your way up which probably argues for the lose effectivness side of the arguement.
Though people on the other side argue how pro's stay on all year round within a similar dose range and don't stop growing, and that the receptors regrow and renew every few months anyway regardsless of any downgrading even if that occurs.
Reason I'm asking this question is because I'm currently at 20% BF and looking to trim a bit off before my next bulk cycle, which I'm now ready for time off wise. I was thinking if the amount of cycles you've got under you belt has no baring on the next cycles effectiveness if your at the same starting point in terms of natural limits, I could just do at cutting cycle then onto a bulk, or a super clean cycle with test P, anavar and maybe a little treninstead of waiting around an extra amount of time when I could be on cycle