There is some research on Winstrol which shows that the injctable version elcits significantly greater results compared to oral intake, mg per mg. I cannot recal off the top of my head exactly how much more effective it was, but I think it was around 20% of something like that. Reagrdless, there was a disctinct difference.
It would stand to reason that methandrostenolone would behave similarly, although to my knowldge, there has not been any studies done which directly compared oral vs. injectable admisration.
Back in the 60's, we also saw numerous methylated compounds tested by intramuscular injection...and the results obtained appeared to outshine the results we get with some of these same orals today when using oral administration.
Based on these examples, as well as my understanding of oral vs. instramuscular administration, I tend to believe that compounds administered directly into the body via injection will produce a better result mg for mg.
Interestingly, I will likely ne trying some injectable d-bol in about 10 days. It will be a short run of 100 mg for 15 days, after which point I am going to move onto other orals. If you are wondering why I am running it for only 15 days...it is because I only have one bottle...and will be following it up with SD for 4-5 weeks.
Even with sch a shoirt run, I am hoping to pick up on any differences between the 2 routes of administration, as I have run oral D-bol many times and understand what to expect by 15 days in. I anticipate better results. We'll see. Ohhh...and I will be injecting 50 mg 2X per day. Since the oil-based injectable enters circulation significantly slower than with oral administration, a twice daily injection should be fine for maintaining pretty stable blood levels of the drug.