DocJ
New member
Please elaborate how these studies would apply to the average "Joe Blow" cycling aas?macro said:two strong refutations of the primary claim of this "article"
Also, I'm pretty sure the author of the article isn't selling Naloxone
Please elaborate how these studies would apply to the average "Joe Blow" cycling aas?macro said:two strong refutations of the primary claim of this "article"
DocJ said:Please elaborate how these studies would apply to the average "Joe Blow" cycling aas?
Fair enough but what about post-cycle?macro said:because they directly contradict the claims that naloxone maintains LH and GnRH in the presence of exogenous androgens or estrogens. So it would directly apply to "joe blow" Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) user.
basically the article is pretty much worthless.
It gives only a minimal nod, an after thought, to aromatase inhibitors. Which is the only reason its not completely worthless.
macro said:because they directly contradict the claims that naloxone maintains LH and GnRH in the presence of exogenous androgens or estrogens. So it would directly apply to "joe blow" Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) user.
basically the article is pretty much worthless.
It gives only a minimal nod, an after thought, to aromatase inhibitors. Which is the only reason its not completely worthless.
It was a nightmare. I eventually went to sleep and even in my sleep I was naseous and had to wake up to vomit.
Everything else aside, the only way anyone can make the statement that suboxone doesn't make a non-addict feel fucked up has clearly never tried it. My boy was on it when his opiate addiction got real bad. I tried a piece that was literally the size of the top of a pin. Shit fucked me up like nothing else I have ever experienced. I got the spinnies for hours. It was a nightmare. I eventually went to sleep and even in my sleep I was naseous and had to wake up to vomit. I wouldn't reccomend anyone mess around with this crap. And it can definitely be addicting