Ranking anabolics for newbies

K

Kane_Red_Machine

Guest
anabolics Ranking for newbies

This is an balanced point of view, shared by many users, about abilitys of some steroids.

*** undergo a change 09:11 AM***
Adjusted 09:13 AM

i made picture cause it seems than some users have no microsoft office.
 
Last edited:
Pretty nice post for the most part. It was interesting because whenever I see those types of charts, I never see a category about the cost of each steroid, like what you had in your chart.
 
well done on the chart everyone should see it REAP look at the chart bro it might answer a question of yours dude just lookn out 4 ya
 
How is HGH an 8 for strength and weight gains? And why so high in side effects? I have to disagree with that one.

4/10 on side effect, it's low...
it have 4, because ther's no conclusive treatment on his side effects.

Exemple: if your insulin level decrease; you'll never know, early enough, if it's definitly or not.

also with the TSH treatment...

So you're an user, i wish you to have never sides at all, you know my point of view on this point.

but nobody is everybody... that the reason why it could not have lower than 4/10...

of corse a part of users have no sides effects.
 
Last edited:
you go wit ya bad self machine i didnt even know that bro hmm learned somethin today lol sweet.
 
1) "balanced" point of view, not "straigth" point of view (read Reap)

2)If you have studys which prooves, brings, learns, anything about hgh, post them.

3)This shart, is not a study at all, you're taking it personnal i guess.

4)it's just a "balanced point of vew" (third time i say it)

5)So i told some have noway sides effects.

6)Impossible to say "nobody" got sides.

7)No offense, i couldn't be fair that mush.
 
Last edited:
Sorry bro, didnt mean to seem like I was being aggressive or trying to discredit you. Its just that in pretty much nearly every controlled study ever done, its been shown that strength and muscle gains are not very high from HGH. I think you can talk to pretty much everyone on these forums thats used it and they can back that, myself included.

I understand you are giving a "balanced" point of view, but "strength and gains" are just that..."strength and gains". You have HGH listed as being an
8* in those 2 areas. I could see if you said anything below 5, hell I coulda not said anything even if you said up to 6*, but 8? I have yet to see where 1 person who used HGH and only* HGH ever gained very much strength or muscle from it.

If I had just signed up for this forum researching HGH, then I found your post. It would make me want to go and buy HGH for the gains being rated so highly. Then after spending money for all the HGH needed, Id be sorely dissappointed. So take it how you want, but I think 8* is way too high based not only on my experiences thus far, but from many others as well. Like I said though Im not trying to discredit you in any way, only wanted to point out the facts. Ive learned a lot from reading your posts and thank you for that.


You rigth if you consider only amateur of BB.
but stand one second, and think at some pro-BB...
i don't like some of her freaky look, too big, but do you think than for some people it couldn't be high as 8* -seldom, but it have to be.

So your post bring a part more balanced on it.

good Reap, your answer as your cycle bring helps.
 
Last edited:
Okay, unless if you consider female users to... i've seen than for injectable Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) ther's none under 4/10 it's not for nothing...

it mean under 4/10* all sides have to be considered uncertain and/or negligible...

BTW i'm surprised to see than you haven't understood that.

So it've been made to be dicussed, but it's better to bring a report with references about, after a complete read... one time, two time, and finaly to post your own shart.

think on this, ther's BB female to... Okay frenchy lover? Have you shave your head off?LOL


Winstrol have to be reconsidered for his sides effects, on that point you're right.

*adjusted
 
Last edited:
oh yeah u're right i completly forgot about females in this chart and they use winstrol with much less sides than primo.. this is true.

and yeah, i shaved my head yday evening. My gf asked me why did i do that.. i said i got the idea on a web forum.. :)
i will put pictures some day as a proof !
 
oh yeah u're right i completly forgot about females in this chart and they use winstrol with much less sides than primo.. this is true.

and yeah, i shaved my head yday evening. My gf asked me why did i do that.. i said i got the idea on a web forum.. :)
i will put pictures some day as a proof !

No don't, i believe you!
 
Last edited:
its an interesting chart. i wonder why syno has slightly different numbers than test prop.

Original syno had 90%- test prop & 10%-estradiol, which had only a mean anabolic power under 40 year old.
and also work immediaty on HPGA.

For my part they (prop and syno) have to be similar, but some don't think like me... So i let it that way.
 
Last edited:
ive gotta disagree with hgh not being a good weight gainer,strength i dont think its the best choice but size, i have witnessed it man!

i watched a guy at my gym blow the fuck up from 140lbs at 5 foot 5 too a super lean,wide and thick mother fucker.

any idea what 20 inch calves look like on a 5 foot 4 frame! freaky along with 29 inch quads!

retarded, he used hgh at 10iu every other day for over 8 months plus cycles of testosterone enanthate.

i dont know the dose of test E. of his kickstarters but everyone in my area gets huge on this.


it costs alot though, but from what i have seen happen, i was amazed.
 
My man this shart will not be updated, but is just an idea about common used Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) and pep-hormona.

But like i said many times nobody is every-body.
HGH can bring a change, but it depend you age, and your health to. and many factor.

BTW the quality of HGH in used is very discuted. ther's alot of crap.
any way. a sterol-hormona lis testo or DHT have almost the same effect for everybody.

10I.U EOD... for 8 month... what was his experience on that? the dosage have to find by test, day after day. so the first cycle is a test to find the appropriate dosage.
some need only 4I.U some ohters 15 I.U...
Nobody have to cycle it like it was a testo or else.
that's my think about.
 
I couldn't open the link for some reason but I like the post. Im very anxious to see if Anadrol was rated #1 for stength and mass. Anadrol is no freakin joke. Never felt anyhting like that in a long time. After 3 sets in the gym I could literally watch myself swell up lke a ballon. Sucks it's so hard on the liver. Test Prop or tren e has gotta be rated #2 for strength. If someone could post which anabolic was rated #1 in strength that would be great. If it's not drol I would wonder the validity of the study.
 
According to Kane's chart, Anadrol, Finaplix, and Test Suspension all tie for first with scores of 10 in both Strength Gain and Mass Gain.

Test Prop is rated an 8 in terms of Strength Gain behind the above mentioned, dbol and parabolan, both of which are rated 9 for strength...test prop rating of 8 for strength also ties it with primobolan depot, hgh, omnadren, sustanon, and test cypionate...... hope that helps
 
I couldn't open the link for some reason but I like the post. Im very anxious to see if Anadrol was rated #1 for stength and mass. Anadrol is no freakin joke. Never felt anyhting like that in a long time. After 3 sets in the gym I could literally watch myself swell up lke a ballon. Sucks it's so hard on the liver. Test Prop or tren e has gotta be rated #2 for strength. If someone could post which anabolic was rated #1 in strength that would be great. If it's not drol I would wonder the validity of the study.

The link work good, and yes, anadrol is rated number one (naabolic-one). because the shard is made by aphabetical-order...

but it's 10-10... in gain. of corse.
 
kane, sick chart. thanks bro for taking the time, good for people just getting into ass. knowledge is power, right?
 
Back
Top