common Thoms we both can do a twinkie diet together.Thoms said:That is about the biggest blasphemy against nutrition there is. The human body is not a car you just put gas in.
common Thoms we both can do a twinkie diet together.Thoms said:That is about the biggest blasphemy against nutrition there is. The human body is not a car you just put gas in.
frankiedawrench said:btw Mallet is not a PETA type at all.
He's probably the smartest guy I've ever seen post on a steroid forum. He got to and maintained a relatively lean 280lbs @ 6'1 on 100g of protein or so a day.
Read the whole article, ask him questions on IFL or UKIron.net. The man is a genius I tell you. I've dropped my protein intake considerably, I used to eat 400g+ on cycle. Never again. Today I probably hit 150g and that's actually working fine for me. only been a few days but I will see how it affects me energy wise etc.
frankiedawrench said:btw Mallet is not a PETA type at all.
He's probably the smartest guy I've ever seen post on a steroid forum. He got to and maintained a relatively lean 280lbs @ 6'1 on 100g of protein or so a day.
Read the whole article, ask him questions on IFL or UKIron.net. The man is a genius I tell you. I've dropped my protein intake considerably, I used to eat 400g+ on cycle. Never again. Today I probably hit 150g and that's actually working fine for me. only been a few days but I will see how it affects me energy wise etc.
i did ask questions on IFL and he or some one else took his thread(s) down instead of answering them. that's cowardly IMO. stick too your guns. and "just answer the fuckin' question."frankiedawrench said:btw Mallet is not a PETA type at all.
He's probably the smartest guy I've ever seen post on a steroid forum. He got to and maintained a relatively lean 280lbs @ 6'1 on 100g of protein or so a day.
Read the whole article, ask him questions on IFL or UKIron.net. The man is a genius I tell you. I've dropped my protein intake considerably, I used to eat 400g+ on cycle. Never again. Today I probably hit 150g and that's actually working fine for me. only been a few days but I will see how it affects me energy wise etc.
no one said he wasnt smart or knows his shit. i have seen and read his posts as well. however i will challange this theory and any other i come across that i dont fully agree with. this long winded low protien diet is one of them.StoneColdNTO said:Agreed, he's right up there with the best of them.
adidamps2 said:i did ask questions on IFL and he or some one else took his thread(s) down instead of answering them. that's cowardly IMO. stick too your guns. and "just answer the fuckin' question."
Mallet had 3 differnt thread up in the diet area, i comment or other wise asked questions.Miss Muscle said:Wait.....they took down this thread and or some posts on IFL? That is cowardly.
Whitemeat said:I just registered to this board simply to make a response to this post. I was in an active discussion on the topic over at ironforlife when it was removed. I think much of the argument over this post is stemmed from people misunderstanding it. Mallet wrote this post on IFL in response to inquiries about eating for general health (getting lean, staying lean, preventing heart disease), not eating to maximize muscle gains. Quote from the original post by Mallet: "I'm going to confine this thread to the effects on ones weight loss and energy level without getting intio any of the other subjects mentioned above." Mallet never intended to convince people you don't need protein to maximize muscle gains. He cited his own experience to show that it is possible to become very muscular eating in this manner. He also cites Bill Pearl to show that vegetarian bodybuilders can become very accomplished. The point was to show how much as a society we overemphasize protein intake.
There was a lot more to this discussion than just this article over at IFL. Discussion about circadian rhythms, food combination, protein degradation, the workings of the human digestive system, digestive enzymes, etc. The purpose of this article may have been less confusing had everyone been able to be a part of the entire discussion. The article was aimed for the members of IFL who are indeed "bodybuilders", but not those with the intention of getting as big as possible. I know nothing about this board, but based on its name, I may assume that most members here are looking to get BIG.
For those of you who are familiar with Mallet, you know that it is always his goal to use nutrition and exercise to maximize his health and well being, not to maximize his muscle mass. But at a lean 245 pounds, he has showed that it is possible to get pretty darn big eating this way. I have a personal goal of attaining a well developed physique, muscular, lean, but by no means huge. This article really seemed to be something to look at for someone like me.
So for those of you looking to be 250+ pounds of muscle, maybe this article isn't intended for you. To get to that size, you are no doubt going to need to eat big quantities of all macros, including protein. But the offset of eating this way for a lifetime is the sacrifice of health. For many, this is a sacrifice people are willing to make, and that's fine.
Sorry for the long rant, but we were having a very productive discussion on this topic over at IFL, then it disappeared. I heard it was being discussed over here, only to find out it was being taken out of its context and being blasted for ideas it wasn't even promoting.
Miss Muscle said:First of all welcome to Ology.
But who the hell cares if the discussion veered from what was intended or the original topic!!! That happens all the time! That is part of the beauty of DISCUSSION forums! You don't post an article and then limit to what the readers can discuss about it. If somebody gets something different out of it or has a question pertaining to something mentioned by another poster......then as far as I'm concerned that's fine!
Miss Muscle said:If people misunderstand the article than why not discuss! Everybody on these boards is obviously interested in the subject at hand or else they would not join up! (Except for the convo loungers here at Ology )
You say the purpose of the article was aimed at those who are indeed "bodybuilders"....not those who want to get as big as possible. Quite often "bodybuilders" DO want to get as big as possible!
OMG I just can't take it anymore...pineapple said:A calorie is a calorie.
DocJ said:OMG I just can't take it anymore...
You need to go over to M&M and AnabolicMinds...at times it doesn't even seem like those guys are speaking english.frankiedawrench said:He's probably the smartest guy I've ever seen post on a steroid forum. He got to and maintained a relatively lean 280lbs @ 6'1 on 100g of protein or so a day.
Whitemeat said:Sorry for the long rant, but we were having a very productive discussion on this topic over at IFL, then it disappeared. I heard it was being discussed over here, only to find out it was being taken out of its context and being blasted for ideas it wasn't even promoting.
DocJ said:OMG I just can't take it anymore...
DocJ said:OMG I just can't take it anymore...
Whitemeat said:yea if a calorie was a calorie things would be sooo simple. We wouldn't need to argue about this stuff and we could just eat whatever we wanted.
We're NOT talking about NUTRITION here (or whats healthy), we're talking about CALORIES.Thoms said:That is about the biggest blasphemy against nutrition there is. The human body is not a car you just put gas in.