Last edited:
Eq Conversion
- Thread starter Perfection Awaits
- Start date
GymLift
New member
Cut corner off of bag. Sqeeze as much EQ out of bag as possible. When I did the liquid test enan, it was like getting that last bit of toothpaste out of the tube. I slide both my fingers on either side of the bag, etc. But you won't get 100% of the EQ out of the bag, I'm sure.Perfection Awaits said:
Not sure about freezing or I guess even the refrigerator is probably good enough. bump for somebody that actually knows, since I shouldn't even be responding to your post since I've never made up EQ.
Just go with the standard 2% BA. Or maybe a little more of less if that is your preference.Perfection Awaits said:
BigRonWannabee
New member
EQ will solidify but it will change to oil like INSTANTLY when you touch the baggie so its not really worth freezin it. Just sqeeze outa the baggie like mranak said. Get a good amount out. I look at it like this. Im not selling anything its all for self, so what the fuck do I care if its 300mg/ml, 310, 290 whatever. Its all the same to me. I just add the approx oil and a splash of BA and its ready to filter. Yes, Ive gotten very relaxed with this shit. And yes, it still works the same as human grade.
GymLift
New member
I weigh the beaker before the hormone is placed into and after the hormone is placed into it. That is just so easy to do.
If I ever write a 'beaker conversion guide' (since one is currently missing), I will be sure to mention to not bother with the 'tare' button if the scale has an auto-off option.
If I ever write a 'beaker conversion guide' (since one is currently missing), I will be sure to mention to not bother with the 'tare' button if the scale has an auto-off option.
Last edited:
BigRonWannabee
New member
A beaker conversion guide. Mranak....COMMON SENCE is what all these retards dont have. If you cant convert shit with a beaker without a guide you probably cant make scrambled eggs without a recipe...its sad.
ya, good idea
thanks everyone,
DougoeFre5h said:
no shit. mranak, stop with all the guides already will ya? sheesh!!
EQ sucks. Honestly, the best way I ever got it was the way my first powder guy sent it. 10g worth in a 10ml syringe. Just shot it into the beaker (without a conversion guide thank you) and went on with my business.
Maybe I should give EQ another try next year. Hmmmmm.
mranak - do me a favor and make a guide to determine how many times I should think about doing EQ again before my mnid is actually made up.
Dave B.
New member
RJH8541 said:no shit. mranak, stop with all the guides already will ya? sheesh!!
EQ sucks. Honestly, the best way I ever got it was the way my first powder guy sent it. 10g worth in a 10ml syringe. Just shot it into the beaker (without a conversion guide thank you) and went on with my business.
Mine came in a flask. Screwed the top off and poured it into the oil.
The deca was much messier, it was a semi-liquid, semi-solid paste in a baggie.
BigRonWannabee
New member
Can we get a guide up to explain in detail how to write a proper guide. You know, guide me through the guide writing process.
GymLift
New member
http://collective.valve-erc.com/index.php?doc=1058691575-11183000DougoeFre5h said:
GymLift
New member
This particular forum has stickies about how to:DougoeFre5h said:
1) Do conversions that are overly complicated
2) Do capping that is overly complicated
So if we advocate simplicity in this forum, why is it that we have stickies that say otherwise?
How about we unsticky those stickies and write a new sticky. The new sticky will say, "if you want to do it the complicated say, please we these links: (and paste in links that point to the old unstickies stickies).
"But if you want to do it the easy and good enough way:
1) Add powder to beaker. Add BA. Add BB if necessary. Add oil. Heat, swirl, filter. Done"
2) Capping: Use dextrose. Add dextrose to calsules. Take dextrose out of capsules and weigh. Remove equal weight from dextrose that you wish to add. Add hormone or drug. Put back into capsules."
Wow, look. That took me one minute to write and it'll reduce the number of question about overly complicated converstions in half.
My point is that many guys never consider the beaker method because it isn't mentioned. They may logically think, "there must be a reason it isn't mentioned" or perhaps they really never thought of it.
BigRonWannabee
New member
Your missing the point. We (those who are regulars) are privy to the secret knowlege that, in fact, this shit is easy. Newbies NEED the reassurance of an overcomplicated (yet correct) guide like the ones I write so that they feel confident injecting thier first time. Yet, if a regular or semi-reglular asks 1001 questions about trivial, common sence stuff Im going to have to jump down thier throat with the over-simplified response.
BigRonWannabee
New member
and you also missed the point that I like to bust peoples balls. Mranak, congrats I busted your balls. Bud, if you write a fantastic, concise little guide I will have no problem sticking it and ridding our sticky section of one of the many worthless threads. I do see your point on that, I guess I proved your point in fact. I just always thought it was SO common sence oriented that only people without a beaker would seek out my stickies for alternative methods.
