I love nandrolone, it's one of the very best IMO. However, it's always NPP and no longer deca. However, I'm just a fan of shorter esters for the reasons posted. And just because you don't deem the reasons all that important, doesn't make them untrue SC... Hormone levels ARE harder to control with longer esters. Examples: you have cyp, I have prop/susp who gets to peak blood levels faster? Then once I do, and you soon follow suit - we both have a bad reaction and have to get off as soon as possible, again who does this first?
I agree that most of the reasons listed are not big deals in any way, but that doesn't mean you can write them off as untrue. The benefits I see with longer esters is the ability to maintain more stable blood levels once peak levels finally are reached. That and the need for fewer shots, and tendency for those shots to give less pain.
One of the biggest problems I find with nandrolone is the inability to control its progestianinc sides. Since I won't be able to get my hand on any RU-486 any time soon, this may be hard for awhile. On the other hand, I did recently come across a product touted as a test booster that worked by lower progesterone (much in the same way these new estrogen inhibitors claim to.), and even compared itself to RU-486. I'll try and dig up a link...
