Mike Arnold
New member
But since I do have your attention now MA, I'd still be really interested in sources (as in factual ones) for the interesting and different info you put in my log about IGF-LR3, MGF, etc.
Pm me.
But since I do have your attention now MA, I'd still be really interested in sources (as in factual ones) for the interesting and different info you put in my log about IGF-LR3, MGF, etc.
Pm me.
I was thinking of trying HGH and have a friend who has these same bottles but when he tested it to see if it was HCG it came up positive with the pregnacy test........Is there any way HGH will test positive on a pregnancy test????
He was told it was samatropin. they looked just like the blue glass vials poted in this thread....
March batch measured 15.5 ng/mL.
"10iu" injected IM 3 hours 11 minutes before the draw.
Z has been advised.
I will post lab report later.
March batch measured 15.5 ng/mL.
"10iu" injected IM 3 hours 11 minutes before the draw.
Z has been advised.
I will post lab report later.
March batch measured 15.5 ng/mL.
"10iu" injected IM 3 hours 11 minutes before the draw.
Z has been advised.
I will post lab report later.
March batch measured 15.5 ng/mL.
"10iu" injected IM 3 hours 11 minutes before the draw.
Z has been advised.
I will post lab report later.
Looks like we are stuck at the 5iu mark. Time for Z to change manufacturers.
![]()
Please find one single generic currently being sold giving readings of 50. Better yet, find ANY current GH products giving readings of 50.
Yes, those high numbers do occasonally happen, but you also need to remember that there is variance in these readings. Not everyone's response will be the same. 50 is really high...over-dosed. You say yourself that Pharm-grade GH (which is dosed perfectly) had readings of 30ish'.
So, if someone occasionally sells GH significantly over-dosed...great, but how many decently priced GH products are you going to find right now giving guys a reading of 50? Exactly. In fact, most GH products now are complete shit!
The point is that Pharm-grade GH is generally considered very good (and expensive), so even if Uncle's is not dosed quite as high as pharm-grade GH, that doesn't mean it's not good, especially when looking at it from a cost effective perspective.
If were looking at it from a cost effective perspective, we could use the following comparison. If you bought 50 IU of GH for $50 or 100IU of GH for $100, which one is the better deal? Using your number of 30 for pharm-grade GH, are you really getting a much better deal with the pharm-grade if your reading is 40% higher, but you have to pay twice as much?
If we know for a fact that Uncle's GH is legit, but not dosed as high as Pharmgrade, I tend to think of a good deal as whatever product gives me the most legitimate GH for my money. Personally, I wouldn't care if a generic brand contained only 25% as much GH as a pharm-grade kit if it only cost $25 a kit! Would you? Who cares how many bottles I have to go through, so long as I am paying a decent price for each IU of GH I get.
I just wanted to put a different slant on this because if the reading is the ONLY thing you look at when determining whether GH is a good deal, you could be missing out. Who gives a shit if some GH is the highest dosed ever, if it cost $1000 a kit! Know what I mean?
Anyway, I am glad we have some real GH.