That was my favorite part of the movieBrett_Weir said:`The old bull said "let walk down there and f$%k them all."' Ecellent point.......And it is funny as hell.......A lot of truth in that....
Obviously you're being thick headed. There are no studies that I know of using a dose higher than 600mgs of test enanthate. If 200mgs is better than 300, and 500 is better than 350, and 600 is better than 500 then what makes you think that 2g wont be better than 1g. Its true if you take 500mgs and gain 15lbs, that doubling the dose wont necessarily give you double the gains, but it sure as hell will give you more gains (which was the original question). All 3 studies noticed a dose response relationship. What would make you believe that at some point there would be none?jcp2 said:Obviously you are not reading my posts, because i stated that i know fo these studies and i have read all them numerous times. What i want to see is your documentation that 1 g per week will not produce the same affects as 2 grams per week. Maybe true in some but i don't beleive for many at the level most on the boards are at. Now may i ask if i shoot 5 grams a week will i not get the same results as 10grams a week. At what point for an average guy does it not matter anymore.
ready2explode said:Obviously you're being thick headed. There are no studies that I know of using a dose higher than 600mgs of test enanthate. If 200mgs is better than 300, and 500 is better than 350, and 600 is better than 500 then what makes you think that 2g wont be better than 1g. Its true if you take 500mgs and gain 15lbs, that doubling the dose wont necessarily give you double the gains, but it sure as hell will give you more gains (which was the original question). All 3 studies noticed a dose response relationship. What would make you believe that at some point there would be none?
ready2explode said:Obviously you're being thick headed. There are no studies that I know of using a dose higher than 600mgs of test enanthate. If 200mgs is better than 300, and 500 is better than 350, and 600 is better than 500 then what makes you think that 2g wont be better than 1g. Its true if you take 500mgs and gain 15lbs, that doubling the dose wont necessarily give you double the gains, but it sure as hell will give you more gains (which was the original question). All 3 studies noticed a dose response relationship. What would make you believe that at some point there would be none?
ready2explode said:Obviously you're being thick headed. There are no studies that I know of using a dose higher than 600mgs of test enanthate. If 200mgs is better than 300, and 500 is better than 350, and 600 is better than 500 then what makes you think that 2g wont be better than 1g. Its true if you take 500mgs and gain 15lbs, that doubling the dose wont necessarily give you double the gains, but it sure as hell will give you more gains (which was the original question). All 3 studies noticed a dose response relationship. What would make you believe that at some point there would be none?
Batman said:Ok, and 10 g maybe is better than 9, so what? The point is connecting the amount of drugs with gains you have, the gains you will keep and the side effects.
Otherwise it's very easy: more is better than less.
And what I'm saying is that science has shown us, so far, that their is a dose dependant relationship when it comes to gains at least up until 600mgs. I am extrapolating these findings, so yes you can argue, but I highly doubt that you are correct. We'll have to aggree to disaggree.jcp2 said:Because at some point the gains stop. At what point is that for most of us. That is where i am going with this. Will i get better gains off 2 grams of test, i am not sure. WIll some people, probably, but very few. This is why i think pro bodbuilding has alot to do with how much drugs can be used by an individual. I don't think the average lifter can use 2 grams of test, and i don't think the results will be noticably better than on 1 gram.
ready2explode said:And what I'm saying is that science has shown us, so far, that their is a dose dependant relationship when it comes to gains at least up until 600mgs. I am extrapolating these findings, so yes you can argue, but I highly doubt that you are correct. We'll have to aggree to disaggree.
Now if you wanted to get into the risk vs benefit talk, I'd agree with 99% of the ppl on the boards.
I think so toojcp2 said:i think after reading this thread we do not differ all that much in our thoughts.