The current GH situation...no longer an issue.

Mike Arnold

New member
GH Test Results



Guys, here is the 1st lab test from the new batch we just got in. This test was done by one of our reps, HeavyIron. HI is an honest guy with a good rep, for those of you who don't know him. I will likley be testing it myself, as well.

Guys, we as reps get the EXACT same stuff you get. There are NO "special shipments". The last 2 batches of GH have been great. I am currently using the last batch and we were all waiting to see HI's results from the new batch.

In December, Uncle recieved a bunk batch of GH from the manufacturer...he was NOT happy. But...being the person he is, once he knew the batch was shit through testing, he "publically" anounced it was bad before anyone on any board had said a single word about it being bunk...and then promised that anyone who got a bad shipment would get a replacment from the next batch (which was tested extensively prior to sale).

We have tested the last batch (which I am currently using) numerous times and all of us who are using it are getting great results with all the traditional GH sides. HI is the first person to test this new batch, with others to follow.

Guys, if anyone wants legit GH, here it is. If you doubt HI's test results or think we are just fucking with you, buy a single kit and test it yourself. When you do, post up all results publically because I am telling you, this batch will not last long...and I am going to be one of the first to get my hands in it. See the link below for lab results.




http://www.steroidology.com/forum/anabolic-steroid-forum/622292-blue-top-labs.html#post3032541




.
 
Last edited:
how much was HeavyIron taking per day and how did he go about getting the actual test done.

i wouldn't go so far as to say it is no longer an issue. that one test came back good.... if z is going to stick with that same blue-tops provider long term and that same blue-tops provider is going to stick with his same guy, etc.... then it could be nice over the long term. this kind of thing can vary kit to kit as well.

anyway, i'm just saying people still have to be just as careful. to me this test doesn't just instantly 'solve' the 'gh issue'. i didn't really consider it much of an issue to begin with though. the places i would go for it haven't yet disappointed....FAR better 'bang for the buck' so to speak.

good to see some blues getting good results tested though, it's a shame the quality on them varies so much from supplier to supplier, i wish more gh connects would stick to the good stuff when they get it like some of them do instead of always trying to find someone they can turn a better buck with.
 
Again, it's great if they are testing well but as a rep how can you honestly say it's the same everyone else gets? Z knows you are his rep, and therefore can choose what he sends you!!

I'm not trying to argue or insinuate he would ever do that, but he has had bad batches before sent to him by his people, what's preventing that from happening again?

And it's not directed at Z, I bet he does have great gh, but it's been the concern with every source.

The problem I have is everyone test some gh then all the respected guys say hey it's good, only having good intentions to help others, then you end up with 100 kits of bad kigs because a few test say they are good, long enough to draw a ton of orders

Point is it's always a risk. I know my guy will replace anything we show him to be bunk or replicated. That's as much as you can ask for because I don't believe the sources are intentionally selling it, they are also trusting someone else.

So feel free to send me a couple kits and I will test them.
 
CM we must be talking serum? The current batch of generics(reds I believe, which is all the same) came back as 27-28 at 10iu. The sad thing is, we were all just happy to see it contain gh, sad but true, and we really like the source.
 
CM we must be talking serum? The current batch of generics(reds I believe, which is all the same) came back as 27-28 at 10iu. The sad thing is, we were all just happy to see it contain gh, sad but true, and we really like the source.

I would be very happy with that result! anything around 30 is what I would like to see.
 
If I'm not mistaken Mike it was actually HeavyIron that was the first to come out and publicy speek on the issue at the time!

Actually a member reported that his labs came back negative for GH so I told him I would verify via serum gh testing. The member had the exact same batch as me. I went in and then asked others to test. 3-4 tests later and several mailings to Z he recalled the lot and replaced all the kits in January.
 
And that's just the problem, at any time a batch can be bad, or low dosed, and not due to our sources, but the places they are getting it from.

I think that was very cool of Z to replace kits, but there has to be a point where they can only replace so many. All of this is coming from other countries, and these are countries where products can be independently tested. The profit margins are huge on ALL of these products, so these guys should have testing run on batches and raws just so they know what they are getting and will know it's not their products when people complain.

It's not that difficult to have testing set up in certain countries, and while it would be considered expensive to the average guy, it's really not to a major lab.
 
CM we must be talking serum? The current batch of generics(reds I believe, which is all the same) came back as 27-28 at 10iu. The sad thing is, we were all just happy to see it contain gh, sad but true, and we really like the source.

The real problem with these tests on the Uncls's generics is that for the price he's charging per iu even at 1000iu the results are much lower than similarly tested other UGL "brands" at a similar price per iu and a bit lower than or similar to generics/UGLs which sell at a much lower per iu price point. Therefore even though they demonstrably do have GH in them, they just aren't cost effective in comparison to others.
 
Back
Top